The Continental Monthly, Vol. 2, No 3, September, 1862: Devoted to Literature and National Policy.Various
General
The Continental Monthly, Vol. 2, No 3, September, 1862: Devoted to Literature and National Policy.
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- 19th century -- Periodicals
There were, however, great and good men during the Revolution, who
warmly sustained the affirmative. The famous Dr. Hopkins wrote as
follows in 1776:
'God is so ordering it in his providence, that it seems absolutely
necessary something should speedily be done with respect to the
slaves among us, in order to our safety, and to prevent their
turning against us in our present struggle, in order to get their
liberty. Our oppressors have planned to gain the blacks, and induce
them to take up arms against us, by promising them liberty on this
condition; and this plan they are prosecuting to the utmost of
their power, by which means they have persuaded numbers to join
them. And should we attempt to restrain them by force and severity,
keeping a strict guard over them, and punishing them severely who
shall be detected in attempting to join our opposers, this will
only be making bad worse, and serve to render our inconsistence,
oppression and cruelty more criminal, perspicuous and shocking, and
bring down the righteous vengeance of heaven on our heads. The only
way pointed out to prevent this threatening evil, is to set the
blacks at liberty ourselves by some public acts and laws, and then
give them proper encouragement to labor, or take arms in the
defense of the American cause, as they shall choose. This would at
once be doing them some degree of justice, and defeating our
enemies in the scheme they are prosecuting.'
'These,' says Mr. Moore, 'were the views of a philanthropic divine, who
urged them upon the Continental Congress and the owners of slaves
throughout the colonies with singular power, showing it to be at once
their duty and their interest to adopt the policy of emancipation.' They
did not meet with those of the administration of any of the colonies,
and were formally disapproved. But while the enlistment of negroes was
prohibited, the fact is still notorious, as Bancroft says, that 'the
roll of the army at Cambridge had from its first formation borne the
names of men of color.' 'Free negroes stood in the ranks by the side of
white men. In the beginning of the war, they had entered the provincial
army; the first general order which was issued by Ward had required a
return, among other things, of the 'complexion' of the soldiers; and
black men, like others, were retained in the service after the troops
were adopted by the continent.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account