The Continental Monthly , Vol. 2 No. 5, November 1862: Devoted to Literature and National PolicyVarious
History
The Continental Monthly , Vol. 2 No. 5, November 1862: Devoted to Literature and National Policy
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Small numbers only of these slaves were brought from their tropical
African homes to the colder North, where their labor was unprofitable,
but, were taken to the South, and against their earnest protest, forced
upon them. It was not the South that engaged in the African slave trade.
It was not the South that brought slavery into America. No, it was
forced upon the South, against their protest, mainly by England, but
partly, also, by the North. Believing, as I do, that this war was
produced by slavery, we should still remember by whom the slaves were
imported here.
Nor should we forget how zealously, from first to last, Virginia,
Maryland, and Delaware, in framing the Federal Constitution, sustained
by Washington, Franklin, and Hamilton, and by New York, Pennsylvania,
and New Jersey, opposed the continuance, even for a day, of the African
slave trade, and how they were overborne by the unfortunate coalition of
the Eastern States with Georgia and the Carolinas, legalizing the
execrable traffic for twenty years, and how fearfully the predictions of
those great prophet statesmen, George Mason, of Virginia, and Luther
Martin, of Maryland, have been fulfilled, that this fatal measure, by
the force of its moral influence in favor of slavery, and by the rapid
importation of negroes here, would menace the peace and safety of the
Union.
Indeed, when the Constitution was framed, Virginia, Maryland, and
Delaware, not only opposed the African slave trade, but interdicted the
interstate slave trade. All these States then regarded slavery as a
great evil, destined soon to disappear, and the failure to adopt gradual
emancipation arose, mainly, from the fact, that the majority could not
agree as to the practical details of the measure. In Virginia,
Washington, Jefferson, George Mason, Madison and Monroe, Marshall and
St. George Tucker, were all gradual emancipationists. Even as late as
1830, the measure failed, only by a single vote in the Virginia State
Convention; and this year, Western Virginia has voted for manumission
with great unanimity. Let us then, as a nation, do our full duty on this
question to all loyal citizens; and the border States, acting by compact
with the Federal Government, will surely adopt the system of gradual
emancipation and colonization. The failure of any State to adopt the
measure immediately, although greatly to be deplored, is no indication
as to what their course will be when the rebellion shall have been
suppressed, and Congress acted definitely on the subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account