The Continental Monthly, Vol. III, No. V, May, 1863: Devoted to Literature and National PolicyVarious
History
The Continental Monthly, Vol. III, No. V, May, 1863: Devoted to Literature and National Policy
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- 19th century -- Periodicals
And what is the precedent against which we have to contend? It is that
of separation. If secession would stop where it has begun, if the result
of our defeat were to be but two great republics of the North and South
upon our continent, there would still be room for the development of
both, and we might even look forward to such a peace with some degree of
complacency, and with hope for a future of happiness and prosperity. But
it will not stop here. As surely as that an overruling Providence
directs the affairs of men, the movement will go on until there are as
many separate and hostile republics as there are States in our Union.
The mutterings of separation--which have already been heard in the West,
are but the precursors of the storm which can only be forever allayed by
the triumph of our arms in the present contest. The slightest
disagreement between the East and the West would soon be made a pretext
for secession: the least dispute or conflicting interest between any two
great portions of our country would find a speedy remedy in separation.
The West would divide from the East, the Atlantic States from the Lake
States, the Mississippi States from the Pacific, the North Pacific
States from the South Pacific, and where would be the end? Already the
great West has learned her own gigantic strength, which before she knew
not that she possessed, and if the time should come when her interests
should apparently point in a different direction from those of the East,
with such a precedent before her, would she not avail herself of that
new-found strength? Already the soldiers of the West have begun to sneer
at the achievements of those of the East, and to consider themselves the
braver and the manlier of the two. Are these not the signs of the times?
And do they not betoken a future of anarchy in the event of the
establishment of this most pernicious and monstrous of doctrines?
And is it to be expected that these many republics, monarchies,
aristocracies, or whatever form they may take, will long remain at peace
with each other? Ask the muse who presides over the pages of history how
often has her pen been called upon to record the circumstance of
separate nations, of the same blood and antecedents, lying quietly and
peaceably beside each other. Family quarrels are proverbially the most
bitter of all on earth, and family hatreds the most unrelenting. It was
but the ties of kin that lent such a character of ferocity to our wars
with England and to the present contest with the South.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account