The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 3, March 1860)Various
History
The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 3, March 1860)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
The advantages that would accrue to the students of the Royal Academy
have now to be considered, and are, perhaps, even still more important.
It is hardly known to the world outside that in the schools of the
Royal Academy almost all the rising artists of the country receive
a _free_ education in art. At present, however, the schools are
subject to the disadvantage of being closed during the months when the
exhibition is open. This has long been deplored, equally by the students
and academicians, but it was unavoidable, since the rooms used for
exhibition are those also used as schools of art. By the new arrangements
of the plan of the lower story, three excellent rooms may be provided
which could be used _throughout the year_ without interruption: the
first as an antique school, the second as a life school, the third
as a painting school; and thus there would be no necessity to close
these schools during nearly five months in the year. In order to give
the schools the advantage of an uninterrupted north light, it would
be desirable that the Royal Academy should occupy the west end of the
building, and the National Gallery the east. The National Gallery would
not be prejudiced in the least by this change, as all the galleries are
lighted from the top. The rooms below, if used for the exhibition of
the drawings of the old masters, as proposed, would be lighted quite
sufficiently from windows at the side, as the best authorities prescribe
a light not too glaring, since drawings are liable to fade, if exposed to
too much light.
As will be seen from the elevation (Fig. 4), the alterations of the
exterior of the building are of no great extent, the principal being
(in addition to that already described in the wings) the removal of the
central and two secondary domes, and the substitution of an attic story,
carried over the central portion of the building; the general effect of
which would be improved by the removal of the small secondary four-column
porticos. If any one will stand in the front of the building, which is
only 450 feet in length, he will be able to count no less than thirteen
different fronts, none of them differing much in extent; the composition
is thus broken up, the unity and mass of the building are lost, and the
repose and dignity which should characterize an important public edifice
are entirely wanting. By the proposed arrangement, the whole façade would
be thrown into an imposing centre, with two massive wings connected with
it by unbroken curtains. That impression of meanness and want of height,
produced by the puny and meagre dome and insignificant cupolas, would be
removed by the substitution of the attic, which would have the effect of
elevating the entire mass of the building.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account