The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 3, March 1860)Various
History
The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 3, March 1860)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
Such at least is his touch when it is life that he paints: for things
lifeless he has a severer hand. If you examine that picture of the
_Graces_ you will find it reverses all the ordinary ideas of expedient
treatment. By other men flesh is firmly painted, but accessories lightly.
Sir Joshua paints accessories firmly,[20] flesh lightly;—nay, flesh not
at all, but spirit. The wreath of flowers he feels to be material; and
gleam by gleam strikes fearlessly the silver and violet leaves out of the
darkness. But the three maidens are less substantial than rose petals. No
flushed nor frosted tissue that ever faded in night wind is so tender as
they; no hue may reach, no line measure, what is in them so gracious and
so fair. Let the hand move softly—itself as a spirit; for this is Life,
of which it touches the imagery.
“And yet——”
Yes: you do well to pause. There is a “yet” to be thought of. I did not
bring you to these pictures to see wonderful work merely, or womanly
beauty merely. I brought you chiefly to look at that Madonna, believing
that you might remember other Madonnas, unlike her; and might think it
desirable to consider wherein the difference lay:—other Madonnas not by
Sir Joshua, who painted Madonnas but seldom. Who perhaps, if truth must
be told, painted them never: for surely this dearest pet of an English
girl, with the little curl of lovely hair under her ear, is _not_ one.
Why did not Sir Joshua—or could not—or would not Sir Joshua—paint
Madonnas? neither he, nor his great rival-friend Gainsborough? Both of
them painters of women, such as since Giorgione and Correggio had not
been; both painters of men, such as had not been since Titian. How is it
that these English friends can so brightly paint that particular order of
humanity which we call “gentlemen and ladies,” but neither heroes, nor
saints, nor angels? Can it be because they were both country-bred boys,
and for ever after strangely sensitive to courtliness? Why, Giotto also
was a country-bred boy. Allegri’s native Correggio, Titian’s Cadore,
were but hill villages; yet these men painted, not the court, nor the
drawing-room, but the Earth: and not a little of Heaven besides: while
our good Sir Joshua never trusts himself outside the park palings.
He could not even have drawn the strawberry girl, unless she had got
through a gap in them—or rather, I think, she must have been let in at
the porter’s lodge, for her strawberries are in a pottle, ready for the
ladies at the Hall. Giorgione would have set them, wild and fragrant,
among their leaves, in her hand. Between his fairness, and Sir Joshua’s
May-fairness, there is a strange, impassable limit—as of the white reef
that in Pacific isles encircles their inner lakelets, and shuts them from
the surf and sound of sea. Clear and calm they rest, reflecting fringed
shadows of the palm-trees, and the passing of fretted clouds across their
own sweet circle of blue sky. But beyond, and round and round their coral
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account