The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 4, April 1860)Various
General
The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 4, April 1860)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
Until the last three or four hundred years, amputation of a limb was very
rarely performed, except when, from injury or disease, its extremity had
begun to mortify; and then, few surgeons ventured to make incisions in
the sound portion, but limited themselves to an operation through the
tissues which had already lost their vitality. This timidity was due to
the fact that they were unacquainted with any effectual means of stopping
the bleeding from the larger arteries divided by the knife. Certain
and easy as is the control of such bleeding now, by the simple process
of tying a piece of thread or silk round the extremity of the bleeding
vessel (as we shall hereafter see), it was unknown, at all events as
applicable to amputation, to any surgical writer from Hippocrates, 400
B.C., or from Celsus, who flourished in the first Christian century,
to the fifteenth. Consequently, the numerous instances of injury and
disease, in which life is now saved by a timely resort to amputation,
were then always fatal. Hence, also, arose the various expedients which
the more adventurous operators of the time resorted to, in order to
stop fatal bleeding, with the effect only of increasing the patient’s
torture, and with the attainment of no good result. Thus the incisions
were performed with a red-hot knife, that the divided vessels, seared
and charred by the horrible contact, might contract, or become plugged,
and so be prevented from bleeding (Albucasis, 11th century). Effective
for the instant, the force of the circulation quickly overpowered the
slender obstruction, and fatal hæmorrhage, sooner or later, took place.
Yet this plan continued more or less in vogue down to the discovery of
the ligature in the 16th century, and was practised even later in Germany
by the celebrated Hildanus (1641); although he subsequently adopted the
new method. According to another fashion, the surgeon, after making a
tedious division of the flesh down to the bone, with studied endeavour
not to divide the arteries until the last moment, relied on applications
of red-hot irons, or of some styptic fluid, usually a powerful acid or
astringent, to arrest the bleeding. If these were not successful, a
vessel of boiling pitch was at hand, ready prepared, into which the
bleeding stump was plunged. Between Scylla and Charybdis, the patient
rarely escaped with life; either he died from loss of blood in a few
hours, or less; or if the dreadful remedies succeeded, he survived a day
or two, to die of fever or exhaustion. After an earlier method, that of
Guido di Caulico (1363), a bandage of plaster was made to encircle the
member so tightly that mortification attacked all the parts below, which
then, after the lapse of months, dropped off, a horribly loathsome and
offensive mass. Another surgeon, Botalli (1560), invented a machine to
sever the limb in an instant by a single stroke; and it was not uncommon
at this period to effect the same purpose by the hatchet, or by a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account