The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 4, April 1860)Various
General
The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 4, April 1860)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
Gigantic as this labour would be, it would be trifling compared with
the labour of classifying all the animals now living (not to mention
extinct species), so that the place of any one might be securely and
rapidly determined; yet the persistent zeal and sagacity of zoologists
have done for the animal kingdom what has not yet been done for the
library of the Museum, although the titles of the books are not absent.
It has been done by patient _reading_ of the contents—by anatomical
investigation of the internal structure of animals. Except on a basis of
comparative anatomy, there could have been no better a classification
of animals than a classification of books according to size, language,
binding, &c. An unscientific Pliny might group animals according to their
habitat; but when it was known that whales, though living in the water
and swimming like fishes, were in reality constructed like air-breathing
quadrupeds—when it was known that animals differing so widely as bees,
birds, bats, and flying squirrels, or as otters, seals, and cuttle-fish,
lived together in the same element, it became obvious that such a
principle of arrangement could lead to no practical result. Nor would
it suffice to class animals according to their modes of feeding; since
in all classes there are samples of each mode. Equally unsatisfactory
would be external form—the seal and the whale resembling fishes, the worm
resembling the eel, and the eel the serpent.
Two things were necessary: first, that the structure of various animals
should be minutely studied, and described—which is equivalent to reading
the books to be classified;—and secondly, that some artificial method
should be devised of so arranging the immense mass of details as to
enable them to be remembered, and also to enable fresh discoveries
readily to find a place in the system. We may be perfectly familiar
with the contents of a book, yet wholly at a loss where to place it. If
we have to catalogue Hegel’s _Philosophy of History_, for example, it
becomes a difficult question whether to place it under the rubric of
philosophy, or under that of history. To decide this point, we must have
some system of classification.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account