The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. IV, No. 2, August 1861)Various
General
The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. IV, No. 2, August 1861)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
This is Westminster Hall. You know it at once. To your left is one door
for Parliament; to your right are seven, for the lawyers. If you peep
into the first of these legal entrances, you will probably see the
cake-woman; and if the court is sitting you will certainly find an eager
knot of grey-bearded, spectacled, wigged, and gowned barristers, engaged
on “three corners,” Bath buns, and pennyworths of plum gingerbread.
Passing through this reminiscence of schooldays, you will bewilder
yourself among a series of doors that shut one upon another. You will
possibly avoid the cross-cutting and divergent passages, and, with the
help of a sad policeman, lifting a heavy crimson curtain, you will take
off your hat, and find yourself in a court of justice. The first thing
you look for is a “place,” which you find high up in the back seats;
and when this has been climbed into, with more or less noise, you find
yourself facing the bench. By the bench, of course I mean the judges.
They are peculiar. Their dress is rather startling at first, till you get
used to it; but it is nothing to their caps, which are represented by a
little black spot on the top of the wig, and, therefore, may be said to
out-muffin the muffin cap of the Bluecoat boy. You may, perhaps, imagine
that a remorseful, or, perhaps, shamefaced feeling on the part of the
last invented judge has led to his contenting himself with a mere white
spot. But be this as it may, from reasons of either dress or feature,
our judges do not quite look like ordinary human beings; at all events,
the casual observer is sure to deny them that privilege. One likens a
celebrated dispenser of justice to a benevolent and intellectual gorilla;
another believes that all judges give one some dim idea of a blinking,
dozy kind of barn owl; a third suggests good old ladies—motherly persons,
given to advice and management, and the having of their own way; while
one more daring has even compared the celebrated and, as I said before,
“newly invented” summer up, to a jolly apple-cheeked old maid, sitting
in judgment upon her married sisters. Perhaps it is not until these
humourists see them as judges in their own cause that they discover them
to be neither blind, weak, nor old-womanish.
[Illustration: The Plaintiff.
The Defendant.]
[Illustration: The Jury.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account