The Cornhill Magazine, (vol. XLI, no. 243 new series, September 1916)Various
History
The Cornhill Magazine, (vol. XLI, no. 243 new series, September 1916)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
Unfortunately, the irrational fashion of tight clothing for the army
instituted by the Prince Regent endures to this day. It is true that
a sensible field-dress of khaki was devised and worn during the South
African War, and is now the service dress of the army; but the full
dress for officers and the ‘walking-out’ uniform for men is still
cut and fitted on the old excruciating lines. I think it took three
weeks to fit a young friend of mine, joining a battalion of Guards a
few years ago, before the adjutant of that _corps d’élite_ passed the
tunic as satisfactory. Every crease and wrinkle had to be obliterated,
at such cost to freedom of limbs and lungs as may be imagined. It may
not be an extravagant hope that, when our army returns once more to
a peace footing, the full dress may be designed with more regard to
health and comfort than hitherto. Our eyes have grown accustomed during
the present war to seeing soldiers in a costume, far from beautiful,
indeed, but easy and respectable. There is no reason why a scarlet coat
should be less comfortable than a dust-coloured one, and it will be a
sad thing if the historic red of the English infantry is not preserved
for full dress. But even if it were not, the khaki uniform might be
rendered very becoming by the addition of a little modest ornament,
especially by the restoration of the old regimental facings. These
would not make troops one whit more conspicuous in the field; on the
contrary, it is a commonplace of optics that parti-coloured objects are
less easily detected in a landscape than those of one uniform colour.
One desirable result of making uniform more comfortable wear might be
expected to follow; officers might not be so scrupulous to exchange
it for mufti the moment they are released from duty. Alone among the
nationalities of Europe has the British officer hitherto treated his
uniform as if it were something to be ashamed of in private life. It is
an unseemly, even an unhandsome practice, seeing that non-commissioned
officers and privates are not allowed to disport themselves in what
they call ‘private clothes.’ Nor was it the custom among officers in
the eighteenth century, when uniform was as easy and becoming as any
other dress. The usual dress of an officer, even when on leave, was
then his undress uniform, just as it is now in Continental armies.
The change in the British Army was the direct outcome of the Prince
Regent’s tyranny in buttoning up soldiers to the throat in clothes
which it was a torment to wear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account