The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 247 new series, January 1917)Various
History
The Cornhill Magazine (vol. XLII, no. 247 new series, January 1917)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
In his letter thanking Walpole for his ‘paternal care’ of the poem Gray
speaks of the advertisement as ‘saving his honour’; which can only mean
that he thought the poem unworthy of being offered to the public by its
author. That this was not a mere affectation is shown by his annoyance
at its instant popularity, which he thought to be due to its subject. He
said it would have been equally popular if written in prose. He writes to
his friend Dr. Wharton, after speaking of ‘A Long Story,’ which had been
‘shew’d about in Town, and not liked at all’:
‘On the other hand the Stanzas have had the Misfortune by
Mr. W.’s fault to be made still more publick, for wᶜʰ they
certainly were never meant, but is too late to complain. They
have been so applauded, it is quite a Shame to repeat it. I
mean not to be modest; but I mean it is a Shame for those, who
have said such superlative Things about them, that I can’t
repeat them.’
Gray’s modesty was still further tried in the autumn of the same year by
Walpole’s insistence that he should allow his still unpublished odes, on
Spring, on Eton College, and on Walpole’s cat, with whatever else he had
to furnish a volume, to appear with illustrations by Walpole’s _protégé_,
Richard Bentley, a son of the great Master of Trinity. The negotiations,
so far as we have them in Gray’s correspondence, are diverting. Gray
discovered that it was in contemplation to prefix his own portrait; this
he forbade, though it was already half engraved. He objected to the
proposed title and insisted that it should be ‘Designs by Mr. R. Bentley
for six poems of Mr. T. Gray,’ on the ground that ‘the verses were only
subordinate and explanatory to the Drawings and suffered to come out thus
only for that reason.’ Lastly, he objected to Dodsley’s proposal to omit
the ‘Mr.’ before the names of the poet and artist, as being ‘an uncommon
sort of simplicity that looks like affectation.’ This modesty may have
been excessive, but it is not ridiculous when we reflect that Gray had
not yet produced his finest work, and knew that he had it in him to write
something more worthy of himself and English poetry than the occasional
pieces which Walpole wished to publish, or even than the deservedly
popular Elegy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account