The Correspondence of Madame, Princess Palatine, Mother of the Regent; of Marie-Adélaïde de Savoie, Duchesse de Bourgogne; and of Madame de Maintenon, in Relation to Saint-CyrOrléans, Charlotte-Elisabeth, duchesse d'
History
The Correspondence of Madame, Princess Palatine, Mother of the Regent; of Marie-Adélaïde de Savoie, Duchesse de Bourgogne; and of Madame de Maintenon, in Relation to Saint-Cyr
Orléans, Charlotte-Elisabeth, duchesse d'
France -- Court and courtiers; French letters; Maison royale de Saint-Louis (Saint-Cyr l'École, France)
"There is one among them," said the mistress (it was Mme. de
Saint-Périer), "who tells me she expects her pleasure in going to see
her friends and receiving them in her own house."
"Assuredly," replied Mme. de Maintenon, "there is much pleasure in
living with our friends and conversing with open hearts, as we say,
and no constraint. But there is," she added in a lower voice to the
mistress, "a pagan maxim, which I think very stern; it is to act with
our friends as if we were sure they would some day be our enemies.
I could secure myself, it seems to me, by letting my friends see
nothing that was bad in me; I should try never to be wrong in their
presence, nor in that of persons whom I loved less, because so many
circumstances occur in life to separate us that friends often become
enemies, and then we are in despair at having trusted them too much,
and having spoken to them freely without reserve.
"Mme. de Montespan and I, for example," she added, continuing to speak
in a low voice to the mistress,--"we have been the greatest friends
in the world; she liked me much, and I, simple as I was, trusted her
friendship. She was a woman of much intelligence and full of charm;
she spoke to me with great confidence, and told me all she thought.
And yet we are now at variance, without either of us having intended
it. It is assuredly without fault on my side; and yet if either has
cause to complain it is she; for she may say with truth: 'I was the
cause of her elevation; it was I who made her known and liked by the
king, and she became the favourite while I was dismissed.' On the
other hand, was I wrong to accept the affection of the king on the
conditions upon which I accepted it? Did I do wrong to give him good
advice and to try, as best I could, to break up his connections? But
let us return to what I meant to say in the first instance. If in
loving Mme. de Montespan as I loved her I had been led to enter in a
bad way into her intrigues, if I had given her bad advice, either from
the world's point of view or from God's, if--instead of urging her all
I could to break her bonds--I had shown her the means of retaining the
king's affection, would she not have in her hands at this moment the
means of destroying me if she wished revenge? 'This (or that) person
whom you esteem so much,' she used to say to me, 'said to me thus and
so; she urged me to do this, she counselled me that,' etc. Have I
not good reason to say that we should not let anything be seen even
to our friends which they might use in the end against us? Sooner or
later things are known, and it is very annoying to have to blush for
things we have said and done in times past."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account