I. An opinion has long prevailed among geologists of a certain school,
that the crust of the earth is of very limited dimensions. A thin coating
of primary crystalline rock is interposed betwixt the sedimentary strata
above, and the intensely incandescent mass of which the interior is
composed. The experiments of Fourier establish a formula of increasing
temperature of the strata in a descending series, and from the rate of
this increase, it is inferred, that about one hundred miles below the
surface the entire nucleus is in a state of complete fusion. Some have
even assumed the melting point to be less than thirty miles, when “the
next contiguous matter is in a state of fusion, at a temperature probably
higher than any that man can produce by artificial means, or any natural
heat that can exist on the surface.”[11] Sir John Leslie attempted a
demonstration of the ultimate resolution of the materials into light,
as the only element capable of resisting the vast pressure of the outer
crust; and, erroneously assuming the _modulus_ of compressibility of air,
water, the metals, and all known earthy substances to be invariable,
however greatly the pressure may be increased, this ingenious philosopher
came to the conclusion, that, instead of Tartarean darkness, the
offspring of superstition, the inner chambers of the earth are filled
with luminous ether, the most pure, concentrated, and resplendent. Darwin
believes that much of the vast continent of South America is suspended
over an inner sea of liquid fire, and says, that, “daily it is forced
home on the mind of the geologist, that nothing, not even the wind that
blows, is so unstable as the level of the crust of the earth.”
With the fires of Etna and Vesuvius raging on the one side, and the
recent though extinct volcanoes of Auvergne and the Cantal seated so near
on the other side, what security is there, amidst so many undoubted facts
of the mobility of the land, that these vast piles of Alpine mountains
may not again, through mere mechanical weight, break through the film
of crust on which they rest, and sink into the abyss from which they so
lately emerged! The doctrine of central heat, it may be replied, does
not necessarily imply the universal _fluidity_ of the central mass, an
opinion supported by Lyell, Poisson, and other eminent philosophers;
while there is reason to infer, as repeatedly stated, that there is
no identity of scale and mechanism between volcanoes now active, and
the igneous causes which gave birth to these and other stupendous
mountain-chains.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account