Nor will the development theory do better, when it would account for
the diversity of instincts which prevail in the animal kingdom. The
instincts, indeed, it assumes as the cause of all their diversity of
structural organization. But this is to beg the whole question. Geology
carries us back to the beginnings of organic life, when animals, each
after their kind, were already perfected, and endowed with a ready-made
apparatus for the particular sphere of existence assigned them. The
polypi are still a distinct race, unvarying in their instincts, not the
least improved in the building art, still piling up reefs, and doing the
same thing which they did when first created. The nautilus has lived
through all time, swimming his fragile bark as dextrously over the
Silurian seas as he now does amidst the breakers of the Pacific. The
cephalopoda and the finny tribes then warred against each other, and
ever since they meet in mortal conflict. The same with all the great
families which were successively brought upon the stage: species and
genera have changed, the old withdrawn, and new ones introduced; but in
their respective orders—reptiles, insects, birds, and quadrupeds—the
type ever continues, and the instincts remain; and there is no nearer an
approximation to or crossing of each other’s domains now, than when first
summoned into being. Were the development theory true in nature, and the
epochs of geology the myriads of ages assumed, the presumption would
be, that the old primitive forms would have been all obliterated and
figures of creatures substituted, all of the most remote and indistinct
analogies. The _monodal_ races, why have they not all passed away? Had
the reptiles sprung from fishes, why, upon the principle of progression,
should there be fishes still? Had man derived his parentage from the
monkey, why are there so many species of the one class, and only a single
great family of the other? The vegetable tribes have been equally true
to their kind—the fucoids and algæ, still abundant in the seas—the pines
of Mar forest, rivaling in coniferous qualities the most gigantic of the
oldest relics—and the palms and fern trees of Australia maintaining the
very types that flourished in the carboniferous era.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account