Here, betwixt God and his work there are no intermediate agencies,—no
pause or rest in the act of coming into being. A material universe is
designed, and the substance of it is instantly produced. The inspired
historian proves that he was inspired, by the brevity of the history of
the event, by the employment of words so perfectly adapted to the nature
of the act. He proves farther, that we have here indicated the precise
course of creation, and that he meant so to represent it—that the heavens
and the earth are of one and the same act—that the physical universe,
through all its dominions and remotest spheres, started at one and the
same time into being. The sun, moon, and stars were now all formed, as
well as our own planet. The stellar systems were everywhere arranged;
and the worlds of matter had their places all assigned them through
infinite space. This part of the Divine actings must not be confounded
with the farther evolution of creation as described in the work of the
fourth day, which has reference manifestly to the division of time and
the appointment of the seasons, through the revolution of the planetary
worlds.
The condition of the earth as it first came from the hand of its framer
is next alluded to. It was “without form and void,” and involved in
darkness; that is, the arrangements necessary to constitute a habitable
globe, were not completed. There was no diversity of surface—no division
into hill and valley, into seas and rivers; the air, the dry land, and
the waters, had not yet assumed their respective places. Form was not
yet stamped upon the matter of the globe. Consequently it was also
VOID, or without inhabitants. Neither vegetables nor animals were
there. They could not exist before these necessary adaptations for life
were adjusted. Let the reader note this stage of the work. Marking the
precise, definite phraseology of the inspired writer, let him seriously
reflect whether he has here before him the first state of the new world,
or the shapeless ruined aspect of one of its subsequent geological
transformations? None of the elements, he will not fail to observe, have
been described as yet existing in separation. The course of creation has
not advanced so far; and, if it had done so, no geologist pretends to
assert, that at the close of any one of his epochs, the laws of nature
were abolished, and all things reverted to their pristine formless
condition. With what propriety, then, may it be asked, can an opening
be made in this part of the narrative wide enough to embrace, or to
have intercalated into it, all the phases of an archaic earth under his
numerous formations, and the vast cycles of time in which they had been
evolving? The language employed admirably represents what we can well
suppose the original physical state of the planet to have been; and that
state accords better with the first than with the last, or any of the
intermediate series of the geological changes. And the earth was without
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account