The Crayfish: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology.Huxley, Thomas Henry
Science
The Crayfish: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology.
Huxley, Thomas Henry
Crayfish; Zoology
[Illustration: FIG. 75.—Astacus leptodactylus (after Rathke, 1/3 nat.
size).]
In the north, _Astacus leptodactylus_ is met with in the rivers
which flow into the White Sea, as well as in many streams and lakes
about the Gulf of Finland. But it has probably been introduced
into these streams by the canals which have been constructed to
connect the basin of the Volga with the rivers which flow into the
Baltic and into the White Sea. In the latter, the invading _A.
leptodactylus_ is everywhere overcoming and driving out _A. nobilis_
in the struggle for existence, apparently in virtue of its more rapid
multiplication.[26]
[26] Kessler (Die Russischen Flusskrebse, l. c. p. 369–70), has
an interesting discussion of this question.
In the Caspian and in the brackish waters of the estuaries of the
Dniester and the Bug, a somewhat different crayfish, which has been
called _Astacus pachypus_, occurs; another closely allied form (_A.
angulosus_) is met with in the mountain streams of the Crimea and
of the northern face of the Caucasus; and a third, _A. colchicus_,
has recently been discovered in the Rion, or Phasis of the ancients,
which flows into the eastern extremity of the Black Sea.
With respect to the question whether these Pontocaspian crayfishes
are specifically distinct from one another, and whether the most
widely distributed kind, _A. leptodactylus_, is distinct from _A.
nobilis_, exactly the same difficulties arise as in the case of
the west European {303} crayfishes. Gerstfeldt, who has had the
opportunity of examining large series of specimens, concludes that
the Pontocaspian crayfishes and _A. nobilis_ are all varieties
of one species. Kessler, on the contrary, while he admits that
_A. angulosus_ is, and _A. pachypus_ may be, a variety of _A.
leptodactylus_, affirms that the latter is specifically distinct from
_A. nobilis_.
Undoubtedly, well marked examples of _A. leptodactylus_ are very
different from _A. nobilis_.
1. The edges of the rostrum are produced into five or six sharp
spines, instead of being smooth or slightly serrated as in _A.
nobilis_.
2. The fore part of the rostrum has no serrated spinous median keel,
such as commonly, though not universally, exists in _A. nobilis_.
3. The posterior end of the post-orbital ridge is still more distinct
and spiniform than in _A. nobilis_.
4. The abdominal pleura of _A. leptodactylus_ are narrower, more
equal sided, and triangular in shape.
5. The chelæ of the forceps, especially in the males, are more
elongated; and the moveable and fixed claws are slenderer and have
their opposed edges straighter and less tuberculated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account