The cremation of the dead: considered from an aesthetic, sanitary, religious, historical, medico-legal, and economical standpointErichsen, Hugo
Religion
The cremation of the dead: considered from an aesthetic, sanitary, religious, historical, medico-legal, and economical standpoint
Erichsen, Hugo
Cremation
Rev. John D. Beugless, D.D., thus describes the burial-grounds of New
York City: “Of the great cemeteries about New York, there is not one,
not even Woodland or Greenwood, in the public lots of which three or
more bodies are not put in one grave,—that of John Doe, who died from ‘a
bare bodkin,’ being sandwiched between those of Richard Roe and James
Low, who were victims respectively of small-pox and yellow-fever. In the
public or poor quarter of Calvary Cemetery a far worse state of things
obtains—more appalling than even the _fosse commune_ of Paris, for it is
the _fosse commune sans chaux_. A trench is dug, seven feet wide, ten to
twelve feet deep, and of indefinite length, in which the coffins are
stowed, tier upon tier, making a flight of steps, five or more deep, and
with not enough earth to hide one from the next. And this is our vaunted
‘Christian burial’ in this new country, with its myriads of broad acres!
What shall our children say of us, when they come, perforce, from stress
of space, to build their dwellings upon these beds of pestilence?”
[Illustration:
THE CREMATORIUM AT BRESCIA.
(From Dr. Pini’s work.)
]
That is the way we, “the Christian nation par excellence,” treat
friendless paupers and criminals. Shame! shame! A dog is more decently
interred.
The cemeteries of the city of Brooklyn occupy nearly 2000 acres of land.
A thoughtful eminent physician gives it as his opinion that the
prevailing southwest wind, blowing over these corruption festering
plague spots, carries to Flatbush the germs of typhoid fever and
diphtheria, and swells the death-rate of that city to its present
alarming magnitude.
The more one considers cremation, the more one finds himself wondering
how it has come to pass that we practice interment, with its many faults
and dangers, and do not burn our dead.
It is clear that overcrowding of burial-grounds must lead to evil
consequences. A ground that is saturated with putrefying material can
emit naught but poisonous odors, cannot fail to contaminate the purest
and clearest water, must vitiate any atmosphere.
Incineration deserves the respect to-day which the ancients paid to it,
and is the only way of disposing of the dead so as to avoid the terrible
consequences of the mephitic graveyard gases, of the dangers with which
the ordinary mode of burial threatens us.
The truth was taught us by the Tuscans some three hundred years ago. At
that time a whale was cast upon the shore of Tuscany. The inhabitants of
the surrounding country hastened to the spot, and removed the ribs of
the large fish, to hang them in the churches as a memento of the rare
occurrence. The flesh was left to rot in the scorching southern sun. An
epidemic of typhoid fever was the result; and when, ten years later,
another whale happened to strand in the same locality, the people,
having become wise by its previous experience, destroyed the monster by
chopping it to pieces, and burning these, one after another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account