The cremation of the dead: considered from an aesthetic, sanitary, religious, historical, medico-legal, and economical standpointErichsen, Hugo
Religion
The cremation of the dead: considered from an aesthetic, sanitary, religious, historical, medico-legal, and economical standpoint
Erichsen, Hugo
Cremation
“Dr. Joseph Akerly expressed the belief that Trinity Churchyard had been
an active cause of the yellow fever in New York in 1822, aggravating the
malignity of the epidemic in its vicinity. This church was built in
1698, and the ground had been receiving the dead for 124 years.
Sometimes bodies were buried only 18 inches below the surface, and it
was impossible to dig without disturbing the remains. During the
Revolutionary War, this burial-ground had emitted pestilential odors,
and in 1781 Hessian soldiers were employed to cover the ground with a
layer of earth two or three feet in depth. The ground was unusually
offensive in 1782, and annoyed passengers on the surrounding streets
previous to the appearance of the yellow fever in July. During the
epidemic, the condition of this churchyard, and the virulence of the
disease in its vicinity, called for some active measures, and on the
night of Sept. 22 Dr. Roosa covered the ground with 52 casks of
quicklime, the stench being at the time so excessive as to cause several
laborers to vomit. On the 25th and 26th of the same month St. Paul’s
Churchyard, and the vaults of the North Dutch Church in William Street,
received the same treatment, these being likewise very offensive and
foci of epidemics.”
When the yellow fever raged in New Orleans in 1853, the death-rate in
the Fourth District (in which there were three large burial-grounds) was
452 per 1000 of the population.
Dr. Bryant, writing on yellow fever at Norfolk in 1855, regards
cemeteries as a constant source of danger in an epidemic, and urges the
total forbidding of intramural or even near-by suburban cemeteries.
Sir Spencer Wells related a fact recently at a meeting of the Health
Exhibition in London, England, which has a strong bearing on the source
of epidemics and their annihilation by cremation. Some persons who had
died of scarlet fever were interred in a country graveyard. Thirty years
afterward the cemetery was included in a neighboring garden, and the old
graves dug up. Scarlet fever forthwith broke out in the rectory and
parish, and no other probable source having been discovered, it is
impossible to avoid the inference that the germs of scarlatinal
infection can retain their vitality a third of a century.
In epidemics individuals should be forced to allow their dead (unless
they succumb to some disease other than the prevailing scourge) to be
cremated. To stamp out a contagious or infectious malady, or to arrest
its progress, incineration must be made general; its benefits are _nil_
when confined to isolated cases. The individual must stand back when the
public health is in jeopardy.
Governments should not allow bodies to be introduced into their
respective countries from an infected land, unless such bodies have been
previously reduced to ashes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account