The Crime of the Century; Or, The Assassination of Dr. Patrick Henry CroninHunt, Henry M.
History
The Crime of the Century; Or, The Assassination of Dr. Patrick Henry Cronin
Hunt, Henry M.
Cronin, Patrick Henry, 1846-1889; Trials (Assassination) -- Illinois -- Chicago
Genesee House, Buffalo, N. Y., Aug. 20, 1888. Committee called to
order. J. D. McMahon, President; P. A. O'Boyle, Secretary.
Present: J. D. McMahon, P. A. O'Boyle, P. McCahey, J. J. Rogers, P.
H. Cronin, C. F. Burns, Sullivan, Feeley, Boland, Ryan, Devoy,
Trude, O'Neill, McCahey.
On announcement by the Chair that the committee was ready for
business, Mr. Sullivan stated that he had an objection to offer to
the constitution of the committee. The chairman asked if it was to
the committee as a whole, or to any particular person.
Sullivan answered that it was to the personnel of the committee;
that one of the committee was a malignant enemy of his
(Sullivan's); that the same party was forever pursuing him with a
design to injure him; that as an expelled member of the order, that
party referred to ought not to sit in any committee. Continuing,
Mr. Sullivan said that the party referred to was Dr. Cronin, who
recently had made statements through a newspaper in regard to him
that he knew to be false; that the newspaper editor (giving name of
paper and editor) had sent him (Sullivan) a letter of explanation,
and that for this and many other reasons he objected to being tried
by the committee as constituted.
Messrs. Feeley and Boland followed, both strongly objecting to Dr.
Cronin. Boland said that though personally he had some objections
to Dr. McCahey he would waive those objections and join with
Messrs. Sullivan and Feeley in asking that Dr. Cronin retire from
the committee, they being willing to accept any one in the room in
preference.
Dr. Cronin replied to this; said he thought it strange that Mr.
Sullivan should speak of him as a malignant enemy. He (Cronin) had
never characterized Sullivan personally as an enemy; anything said
by him (Cronin) was directed toward the men whom he was given to
understand had wrecked the organization. Sullivan was one of them,
he understood, and only in connection with certain developments
pertaining to the order did he say anything of Sullivan. If Mr.
Sullivan believed everything told him by gossips he (the doctor)
could not help it. "Indeed," the doctor continued, "why should I be
the enemy of Mr. Sullivan? What has he done to me that I should, as
he says, single him out for personal enmity?" As to the newspaper
editor matter, the doctor said, that while not believing in
introducing what savored of American politics, he could explain the
newspaper affair by referring to the paper itself. Mr. Sullivan
would certainly not make an affidavit to the statement that the
paper had done what he said, for he (Dr. Cronin) had evidence that
would readily disprove it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account