The Crime of the Century; Or, The Assassination of Dr. Patrick Henry CroninHunt, Henry M.
History
The Crime of the Century; Or, The Assassination of Dr. Patrick Henry Cronin
Hunt, Henry M.
Cronin, Patrick Henry, 1846-1889; Trials (Assassination) -- Illinois -- Chicago
To this Mr. Sullivan replied that he did not want to make
affidavits, but would say that the creature (referring to the
doctor) should not sit as one of his judges; that he (Sullivan)
could prove by a dozen men, who would not believe the doctor under
oath, that he (the doctor) was an expelled member of the
organization. [Then the paper mentions the names of three men.]
Mr. Cronin said, interrupting Mr. Sullivan, that the gentleman
evidently meant to irritate him or intimidate the committee.
Mr. Sullivan said that he did not wish to intimidate the committee.
Dr. Cronin then said: "Then you probably mean to intimidate me.
That you cannot do, sir, and you ought to know it by this time. All
the objections you urge were made at the convention, and by an
almost unanimous vote, as the selection of that convention, I am
the peer of any one here and doing my duty by the body that created
me. I would not, if I could."
Mr. Sullivan took his seat, overruled by that body.
The Chairman asked all but the committee to retire, and, upon a
vote being taken, the objections of the defendants to Dr. Cronin
were overruled by the votes of the Chairman, Messrs. Burns, Rogers,
McCahey, and Cronin, the Secretary not voting. This was announced
to those making the objections, and the trial proceeded.
Before the trial proceeded, Col. Boland said he had a witness whose
expenses he wished to have guaranteed; that the witness resided at
Leadville. On motion it was ordered that the expenses of witness be
guaranteed.
Col. Boland called attention to the fact that many persons present
who were witnesses, etc., should not know what was going on. The
Colonel said that matters of grave importance might come before the
committee, and as it was common report that one witness had given
information to the British Government, that John Devoy had given
information to the British Government, he requested that none but
the attorneys for prosecution and the defendants remain before the
committee, each witness to be examined separately.
Dr. Cronin objected to this, saying, that as Devoy had been singled
out for animadversion by Col. Boland, it was not fair for the
committee to extend support to Boland's unjust attack.
On motion all but the committee retired. The committee then decided
that each prosecutor should remain with the attorney and that
witnesses be introduced separately; the defendants remaining also;
the committee admitting all those entitled to be present, the
charges were presented and specifications as follows:
1. That no active work had been performed by F. C. that had been
claimed by that body and its agents.
2. The men on errands of the brotherhood had been basely neglected
and their families left without support.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account