The Crisis of Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-One in the Government of the United States.: Its Cause, and How It Should Be MetStreight, Abel D.
History
The Crisis of Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-One in the Government of the United States.: Its Cause, and How It Should Be Met
Streight, Abel D.
Secession; United States -- Politics and government -- 1857-1861
"SEC. 8. _And be it further enacted_, That, in all the territory ceded
by France to the United States, under the name of Louisiana, which
lies north of thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes north latitude,
not included within the limits of the State contemplated by this act,
(meaning Missouri,) slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than
in the punishment of crime, whereof the parties shall have been duly
convicted, shall be and is hereby forever prohibited; provided,
always, that any person escaping into the same, from whom service is
lawfully claimed in any State or Territory of the United States, such
fugitive may be lawfully re-claimed and conveyed to the person
claiming his or her services as aforesaid."
It will be perceived that the above section does not establish slavery
anywhere, but, on the contrary, it prohibited it in all the territory
north of 36° 30' north latitude, while south of that (we can only infer
for there is nothing explicit on the subject) the people were to have
slavery or not as they might decide amongst themselves. But, in order to
the more fully understanding the effect of the Missouri Compromise, it is
necessary to know the amount of territory belonging, at that time, to the
United States, lying south of said above mentioned line. The territory
that now constitutes the State of Arkansas, and a small tract of Indian
territory, which now belongs to four tribes of Indians, to-wit: the
Chickasaws, Seminoles, Cherokees, and Choctaws, all of which territory,
including that of Arkansas, is not much larger than the State of Missouri,
was all the territory that remained of the Louisiana purchase, belonging
to the United States, south of 36° 30' north latitude, at the time of the
passage of said compromise. How different, in effect, from the above is
the Crittenden amendment. Let us see. The following is the said amendment
that is harped about as being a restoration of the Missouri Compromise.
Read and behold the difference:
"WHEREAS, Serious and alarming dissensions have arisen between the
Northern and Southern States, concerning the rights and security of
the rights of slaveholding States, and especially their rights in the
common territory of the United States; and whereas, it is eminently
desirable and proper that these dissensions, which now threaten the
very existence of this Union, should be permanently quieted and
settled by constitutional provisions, which shall do equal justice to
all sections, and thereby restore to the people that peace and good
will which ought to prevail between all the citizens of the United
States: Therefore,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account