The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904Sanday, W. (William)
Religion
The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904
Sanday, W. (William)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
There can be no doubt at all that these ideas of Light and Life are
quite fundamental to the Evangelist, and that they fill a large place in
his mind. But to say this is not quite the same thing as to say that the
Gospel is constructed upon them. The Evangelist has told us in set terms
on what the ground-plan of his Gospel is constructed; ‘these (things)
are written, that ye may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of
God; and that believing ye may have life in his name’ (xx. 31). There is
no need to seek for any other definition of the object and plan of the
Gospel than this.
3. View of Loisy.
The same verse may help us to form an estimate of the theory of M.
Loisy. So far as ‘the theology of the Incarnation’ is meant to express
the same thing, the phrase is certainly justified. And if M. Loisy
intends it to be at the same time a paraphrase for the doctrine of the
Logos, we can have no objection. At least the only objection we need
have would be that he is using a vaguer and more general term, when he
might use one that is both definite and characteristic. As a rule, one
is more likely to get at the heart of a writer’s meaning by laying
stress on the peculiar and individual elements in his teaching, and not
on that which he shares with others.
But the question how far either M. Loisy or Dr. Grill has succeeded in
defining the root-idea of the Gospel is after all only secondary. The
real issue is not as to the accuracy of the definition, but as to the
nature of the relation which is pre-supposed between the root-idea, the
principle which covers the plan and object of the Gospel, and the
narrative of which the main body of the Gospel consists. If I may speak
for a moment of the leading idea, not of St. John but of M. Loisy, I am
afraid that the tendency, if not the purpose, of his whole book is to
convict the author of the Gospel of writing fiction where he professes
to write fact. ‘The theology of the Incarnation’ is a euphemism which is
meant to describe the Gospel as from end to end allegory and symbol, the
product of an idea and not of reality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account