The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904Sanday, W. (William)
Religion
The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904
Sanday, W. (William)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
i. We observe here, as in so many other cases, that the theory reflects,
not so much the essential disposition and proportions of the facts as
the state of the extant evidence. Hardly anything has come down to us
from the early years, at least for the first three decades, of the
Mother Church; and from that which has come down to us, the earlier
chapters of the Acts and the Epistle of St. James, criticism would make
considerable deductions. I think that these deductions are greater than
ought to be made, but their existence cannot be ignored. What we know of
the Mother Church has to be pieced together by inference and
constructive imagination. On the other hand for St. Paul we have in any
case an impressive body of certainly genuine epistles. It is natural
enough that the mind should be dominated by these, and that the
assumption should be made—for it is pure assumption—that the leading
ideas of these epistles are an original creation.
ii. But there is nothing really in the Epistles themselves to bear out
this assumption. St. Paul does not write as though he were a wholesale
innovator. He does not write as though he were founding a new religion.
On the contrary, he lays great stress in a familiar passage (1 Cor. iii.
11) on the fact that the foundation is already laid. In another place (1
Cor. xv. 11) he speaks as though it made no difference whether he were
the preacher or others, the belief of Christians was the same. St. Paul
has indeed his special views and his special controversies, but they do
not affect the main point. He assumes that this is common to all
Christians.
This brings me to some of the points on which we have to test the
theory, as it is stated by Wernle.
5. Objections to the Critical Theory.
Let us think for a moment what the theory involves. It involves that the
Pauline Gospel not only conquered the West, but that it came flooding
back in a great reflux-wave all over the East. The East, on this theory,
has no power of resistance; it surrenders at discretion. How does this
accord with the evidence?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account