The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904Sanday, W. (William)
Religion
The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904
Sanday, W. (William)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
There are a number of passages in the Gospel and First Epistle of St.
John which go to show that the author either was, or at least intended
to give the impression that he was, an eye-witness of the Life of
Christ. We will leave it an open question for the present which of these
two alternatives we are to choose. And we will begin by collecting the
passages, and justifying the description that has just been given of
them.
The passages fall into groups; the first small but important, the others
larger but, except in a few cases, more indefinite.
On the principles of criticism on which we are going, we shall assume
that the Gospel and First Epistle that bear the name of St. John are by
the same author, and that, so far as the authorship is concerned, what
holds good for the one will hold good also for the other. The proof is
not absolutely stringent. Identity of style, and close resemblance of
ideas, are compatible with duality of authorship, because one writer may
imitate another. But in practice, unless the reasons for laying stress
upon it are strong and clear, a refinement like this may be left out of
account. Of course there is the distinction which Bacon noted between
the minds that are quick to observe resemblances and those that are
quick to observe differences. This question of the relation of the
Gospel of St. John to the First Epistle is a touchstone by which such
minds may be distinguished. I allow that the two works may be assigned
to different authors[33]. I allow it in the way in which on most
questions, if we attempt a nice enumeration of conditions, there is
usually some remote possibility to be allowed for. The quotation from
Dr. Drummond on the _De Vita Contemplativa_ that I gave in the last
lecture may help us to measure how remote the other possibility is. As a
practical person, dealing with these questions on a practical scale, I
shall venture to assume that the Gospel and the First Epistle are by the
same hand. It is of course open to any one to ignore arguments based on
this assumption, if he prefers to do so.
i. Passages which make a direct claim.
I am treading on very familiar ground, but I must ask you to forgive me
if I begin by quoting the opening words of the First Epistle:
‘That which was from the beginning, that which we have heard, that
which we have seen with our eyes, that which we beheld, and our
hands handled, concerning the Word of life (and the life was
manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare unto you
the life, the eternal life, which was with the Father, and was
manifested unto us); that which we have seen and heard declare we
unto you also, that ye also may have fellowship with us: yea, and
our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ:
and these things we write, that our joy may be fulfilled’ (1 John i.
1-3).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account