The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904Sanday, W. (William)
Religion
The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904
Sanday, W. (William)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The _prima facie_ view of this passage undoubtedly is that the writer is
speaking as one of a group of eye-witnesses. But there are two ways in
which this inference is turned aside.
1. Harnack[34] and some others take it as referring not to bodily but to
mystical vision.
2. Others, again, think of the writer as speaking in the name of a whole
generation, or of Christians generally.
In regard to the first of these explanations we note that the word
θεᾶσθαι is used twenty-two times in all the New Testament, including the
present passage; and in every one of bodily and not of mental or
spiritual vision. And whatever sense we may put upon seeing or hearing,
it is difficult to explain such a strong expression as ‘that which ...
our hands have handled,’ where the writer seems to go out of his way to
exclude any ambiguity, in any other sense than of physical handling.
In regard to the second explanation we observe that there is a contrast
between ‘we’ and ‘you,’ between teachers and taught. The teachers are in
any case a small body; and they seem to rest their authority, or at
least the impulse to teach, on the desire to communicate to others what
they had themselves experienced. I have therefore little doubt that the
_prima facie_ view of the passage is the right one. The writer speaks of
himself as a member of a small group, like that of the Apostles, but a
group that may include all who had really seen the Lord and who
afterwards took up the work of witnessing to Him.
The other passage, John i. 14, is more ambiguous: ‘the Word became
flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only
begotten from the Father), full of grace and truth.’ If this had stood
alone, it might have seemed an open question whether ‘we beheld’ was not
used in a vague sense of Christians generally—or even of the human race,
as ‘tabernacled among us’ just before might mean ‘among men.’ But the
more specific reference would be more pointed; and it is favoured by the
analogy of the passage of which we have just been speaking as well as of
those which follow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account