The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904Sanday, W. (William)
Religion
The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904
Sanday, W. (William)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The Gospel has not long opened before we begin to receive that subtle
impression which is given when one who has himself taken part in a scene
reproduces it as history. I know that this kind of effect may be
produced by imagination; and I will not assume as yet that it may not be
so produced in this instance; I content myself for the present with
pointing out that it exists.
When we take the last two paragraphs of the first chapter of the Gospel
(i. 35-51), I think we shall feel as though we were being introduced to
a little circle of neighbours and acquaintances. Two friends, one of
whom is called Andrew, and the other is unnamed, are interested in what
they have seen of Jesus and in what the Baptist had said about Him, and
they ask leave to join Him. They remain for some hours in His company;
and it is clear that their interest is not diminished. Andrew finds his
brother Simon, and he too is brought up and introduced. Jesus Himself
takes the initiative in inviting a fourth, Philip. We are told expressly
that Philip was from the same city as the two before named; and he in
turn finds and introduces his friend Nathanael. There is just one of the
five whose name is not given. He is the silent spectator in the
background. What if it were he to whom we owe the story? In any case
there is this little group, all apparently from the same locality, who
naturally enough find themselves together, drawn at first by the
preacher of repentance, but leaving him to join one greater than he.
We pass over to the next chapter; but that will give us more to say
under the next head. There are many points upon which we might pause,
but I will pass on to the middle of chap. iii (vers. 22-6). There we
have the description of what have now become two groups, the disciples
of Jesus and the disciples of John, in near proximity to each other, and
with easy intercourse between them. The narrative seems to be written
from the standpoint of the disciples. The two principals are in the
background, but we follow the events of the day among their _entourage_.
There is a little discussion between some of John’s disciples and a
stranger (R. V.) about a question naturally connected with baptism. Such
a discussion might have interested at the time one who was near at hand
and in friendly relation with those who took part in it. But it would be
hard to find any other motive that could suggest it to a Christian at
the end of the first century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account