The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904Sanday, W. (William)
Religion
The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904
Sanday, W. (William)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
This is a question that should not be difficult to answer. It should be
less difficult than in the case of most periods, because as a rule one
period shades gradually and imperceptibly into another, and there is a
more or less prolonged transition. But the history of Judaism and
Christianity in the first century of our era is not like this. There we
have one great catastrophe standing out in the boldest possible way and
dividing what goes before from what comes after. The destruction of
Jerusalem by Titus completely altered the conditions of Judaism, and
altered no less the conditions of Christianity both in itself and in
relation to Judaism. We have to remember that Judaism as it existed up
to that date—from the time of Josiah to the year 70 A.D.—had been the
most centralized religion of the ancient world. Its system of worship,
its hierarchy, and what remained to it of self-government, all had a
single centre in the holy place and the holy city, the temple and
Jerusalem. It is true that there was the newer institution of
synagogues, which was destined to play such an important part in the
Judaism of the future; but this was as yet quite subordinate, existing
side by side with the temple worship, but not consciously regarded as a
substitute for it.
Now with one single stroke the whole of this temple system, the
hierarchy, and the Sanhedrin, as hitherto constituted, came to an end.
It was not that it went on with modifications, but it was destroyed root
and branch.
At the same time Christianity broke loose from Judaism more thoroughly
than it had ever done before. Henceforth the dominant forces in the
Church were Gentile, not Jewish. In particular the last shreds of the
idea of a political Messiah were thrown off.
These considerations supply us with abundant means of testing the
picture of the time that we have in the Fourth Gospel. We can easily
determine whether its features correspond to the state of things in the
first half of the first century or at its end. What we have chiefly to
ask ourselves is, does the Fourth Gospel presuppose a centralized
religion or a de-centralized? We may discuss this in relation to (i) the
pilgrimages to Jerusalem and the Jewish feasts; (ii) the detailed
ceremonies connected with those feasts; (iii) the temple itself; (iv)
the state of sects and parties; (v) the Messianic expectation.
i. Pilgrimages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account