The Cultivation and Manufacture of TeaMoney, Edward
Science
The Cultivation and Manufacture of Tea
Money, Edward
Tea
There seems to me to be but one doubtful point. The boxes cannot be
sent loose on board ship: how then are they to be packed? Chests
holding four tin boxes were recommended, but they do not smile on me.
True, they might be made very light: still they would add to the
size, weight, and cost considerably. I think crates of strong light
battens would answer perfectly, and six, or perhaps eight boxes might
then be placed in each. However, this is a matter of detail, which
experience would quickly decide. To continue the advantages:
5. Teas packed in these boxes, and so sold, would not be used for
bolstering up China rubbish. They would be drunk pure, and thus the
great desideratum of teaching the public, both here and abroad, to
use Indian Tea by itself, would be, in a measure, attained.
I do not say that any planter should pack _all_ his Teas in this
new way. The mass of Indian Tea, do what we may, will still be used
to mix with China. Again, the highest class of Indian Teas are not
the ones to commence with. As a rule they are too expensive for the
public to use them alone. Ordinary Teas, or perhaps a mixture which
could be sold cheaply, and would be a good household Tea, is what I
should recommend. It is just this kind which is now such a drug in
the market, and necessarily the diversion of some of this into other
channels would help us greatly.
6. A considerable saving in the loss of Tea at the Custom House would
result by the use of these boxes, as the following figures will show.
To begin with, the trade allowance of 1 lb. per package which is now
allowed the buyer, and which is of course a loss to the producer,
would be avoided; for this allowance does not apply to any package
under a gross weight of 28 lbs., and these tins with 20 lb. 2 oz. of
Tea in them, will weigh gross only 24 lbs. 1-1/2 oz.
To make the figures below clear, I must state that the rule of the
Custom House is to discard fractions of a pound both in the gross
and the tare. But in the gross the number _below_ is written, in
the tare the number _above_. Thus, if the gross weight of a package
is 132-1/2 lbs., the gross is written 132. If the tare of a package
is 37-1/4 lbs., it is written 38. Now to take one extreme case, to
show the loss on our ordinary Indian packages: a chest weighs gross,
say, 132 lbs. 15 oz.; it is still written 132 lbs. The tare of the
said package weighs, say, 37 lbs. 1 oz.: it is written 38. The tare
deducted from the gross gives the net weight of Tea. In this case 132
minus 38 equals 94 lbs., which is all the producer is paid for. But
the net weight of Tea in the box is 132 lbs. 15 ozs., minus 37 lbs.
1 oz., equals 95 lbs. 14 ozs., and thus on such a package there is a
loss of exactly 1 lb. 14 ozs. Add to this the trade allowance of one
pound, and the whole loss is 2 lbs. 14 ozs., which is about 3 per
cent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account