Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; United States -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; Women -- Fiction
The morning on which Jane Kelly was to have her hearing, found Madame De
Marke punctual. The judge, who recognized her real position, was
comparatively deferential; for wealth, even when allied with
degradation, is not without power. Besides, her manner, as on the
evening before, bespoke considerable knowledge of good society and its
usages.
Madame De Marke repeated the conversation which she had already stated.
A lawyer, employed by her, was also in attendance. Jane was without
professional aid.
“The case seems clear,” said the judge, when Madame De Marke had closed
her testimony. “What have you to say? You may speak now!” he added,
turning to the prisoner.
The girl had frequently interrupted Madame De Marke until the judge had
sternly ordered her, more than once, to keep silence; and now her
suppressed rage found short and bitter words.
“She deserves the State’s prison more than I do!” cried Jane, white with
passion, and looking at Madame De Marke as if she could have stabbed her
to the heart. “She is ten thousand times worse than a thief”—
“Stick to the point,” interposed the judge. “The question is not, what
this lady may, or may not have done; but what proof there is that you
did not steal the jewel.”
“Proof! Does anybody want proof that she is blackhearted, treacherous,
lying, cowardly, a secret murderer?” raved the girl. “Yes, a murderer!
She wanted me to commit murder,—to let a sweet young creature starve on
her sick-bed, and tried to bribe me with that very ear-ring. And now she
says I stole it.”
“Have you any proof of this?”
“Proof! Proof again! What proof is there, but her word, that I took the
ear-ring!” said Jane, with quick shrewdness, a thing she was not
deficient in, when rage did not overmaster her entirely. “My word ought
to be as good as hers. She says I stole the ring, and I say she gave it
to me; what proof has she that her story is a bit truer than mine?”
“She swears to it.”
“I’ll swear to mine.”
“That the law does not allow. An accused person cannot be a witness in
his or her own behalf.”
“But the accuser may be a witness for her side.”
“No. It is the Commonwealth that prosecutes, and the accuser is only a
witness for the State.”
Jane broke forth indignantly—“You dare to call this justice! Such
pitiful stuff you name ‘the wisdom of the law!’”
She spoke these last words with bitter scorn. “If some one would come,
and swear that you, the judge, had stolen, you’d have to believe ’em,
ha! ha!”
“Order!” cried an officer, horrified.
“Order! order!” shouted the equally horrified clerk.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account