The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 2 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Religion
The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 2 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Iran -- Religion; Religions
Without entering here into the details of metaphysical
refinements which the Hindus exhibit in their various
systems of philosophy, we may content ourselves to state
that, in general, they adopt two kinds of bodies or persons,
a subtile, and a substantial or grosser one. The first
transmigrates through successive bodies, which it assumes as
a mimic shifts his disguises to represent various
characters. In the Bhagavad gita, it is intimated, that soul
retains the senses and mind in the intervals of migration:
“At the time that spirit obtains a body, and when it
abandons one, it migrates, taking with it those senses, as
the wind wafts along with it the perfumes of the flowers.”
The grosser body, propagated by generation, is perishable.
According to Manu (XII. 16): “After death, another body,
composed of the five rudimental elements, is immediately
produced, for wicked men, that they may suffer the tortures
of the infernal regions.” This concords with what is said
above.
[303] They are also called _Brahma Sampradáyis_. The founder
of this sect was Madhwácharya, a Brahman, born in the
Saka-year 1121 (A. D. 1199), in Tuluva, on the western coast
of the Indian peninsula; he died in his seventy-ninth year.
He was early initiated into the order of Anchorets, and
devoted to Vichnu; he composed thirty-seven works, built
eight temples, and founded as many _maths_, or “monasteries”
of his particular sect, which is one of the four great
sects. The superiors, or “Gurus” of it are Brahmans and
Sanyásis; their lay-votaries are members of every class of
society except the lowest; they profess perpetual celibacy.
These sectaries reside now chiefly in the peninsula, and are
altogether unknown in Gangetic Hindostan. To what is above
said of their doctrine, I shall add, that they distinguish
the principle of life from the supreme Being, or they deny
the absolute unity of the Deity, and the possibility of
absorption into the universal spirit, and the loss of
independent existence after death.――(See an explicit account
of this sect, by Professor Wilson, _As. Res._, vol. XVI. p.
100-108.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account