The Daltons; Or, Three Roads In Life. Volume I (of II)Lever, Charles
General
The Daltons; Or, Three Roads In Life. Volume I (of II)
Lever, Charles
English fiction -- 19th century
“Nothing of the kind, Scroope.”
“A scratch, but not a wound, perhaps,” said Haggerstone, with a grin of
malice.
“I am ver happy please ver moosh,” said the Count, “for de sake of de
order. I am republiquecain, but never forget I 'm de noble blood!”
“Beautiful sentiment!” exclaimed Mrs. Ricketts, enthusiastically.
“Martha, did you hear what the Count said? General, I hope you didn't
lose it?”
“I was alway for de cause of de people,” said the Count, throwing back
his hair wildly, and seeming as if ready to do battle at a moment's
warning.
“For an anti-monarchist, he turns up the king wonderfully often at
ecarte” said Haggerstone, in a low muttering, only overheard by Martha.
“I don't think the demo-demo-demo” But before Purvis had finished his
polysyllabic word, the company had time to make their farewell speeches
and depart. Indeed, as the servant came to extinguish the lamps, he
found the patient Purvis very red in the face, and with other signs of
excitement, deeply seated in a chair, and as if struggling against an
access of suffocation.
What the profound sentiment which he desired to enunciate might
therefore be, is lost to history, and this true narrative is unable to
record.
CHAPTER XXVIII. THE VISCOUNT'S VISION.
WHEN Lord Norwood arrived at the Mazzarini Palace, he was surprised not
to find the usual half-dozen carriages of the habitues drawn up in the
courtyard, and still more so to learn that her Ladyship did not receive
that evening. He ascended to George Onslow's apartment, and discovered
that he had dined with Prince Midchekoff, and not yet returned. Not
knowing how to spend the hours, so much earlier than those of his
usually retiring to rest, he lighted a cigar, and threw himself on a
sofa before the fire.
The reveries of men who live much in the world are seldom very
agreeable. The work of self-examination comes with a double penalty when
it is rarely exercised, and the heavy arrears of time are formidable
scores to confront. Lord Norwood was no exception to this theory. Not
that he was one to waste time or temper in self-reproaches. The bygone
was essentially with him the “irrevocable.” It might, it is true,
occasionally suggest a hint for the future, but it never originated a
sorrow for the past. His philosophy was a very brief code, and comprised
itself in this, “that he did n't think well of himself, but thought
worse of all others.” All that he had seen of life was duplicity,
falsehood, selfishness, and treachery. In different stations these
characteristics took different forms; and what was artfully cloaked in
courtesy by the lord was displayed in all its naked deformity by the
plebeian.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account