Conduct of life; English essays -- 20th century; Ethics; Philosophy
Schopenhauer long ago pointed out that a picture should be looked at
as a royal personage is approached, in silence, until the moment it
pleases to speak to you, for, if you speak first (and how many critics
one knows who “speak first”!), you expose yourself to hear nothing but
the sound of your own voice. In other words, it is a spontaneous and
“mystical” experience.
Footnote 137:
It is through Plotinus, also, that we realise how æsthetics is on the
same plane, if not one, with mysticism. For by his insistence on
Contemplation, which is æsthetics, we learn to understand what is
meant when it is said, as it often is, that mysticism is
Contemplation. (On this point, and on the early evolutions of
Christian Mysticism, see Dom Cuthbert Butler, _Western Mysticism_
(1922).)
Footnote 138:
Really, however, Plotinus was here a Neo-Aristotelian rather than a
Neo-Platonist, for Aristotle (_Ethics_, book X, chap. 6) had put the
claim of the Contemplative life higher even than Plato and almost
forestalled Plotinus. But as Aristotle was himself here a Platonist
that does not much matter.
Footnote 139:
See Inge, _Philosophy of Plotinus_, p. 179. In a fine passage (quoted
by Bridges in his _Spirit of Man_) Plotinus represents contemplation
as the great function of Nature herself, content, in a sort of
self-consciousness, to do nothing more than perfect that fair and
bright vision. This “metaphysical Narcissism,” as Palante might call
it, accords with the conception of various later thinkers, like
Schopenhauer, and like Gaultier, who however, seldom refers to
Plotinus.
Footnote 140:
R. Schmidt, _Deutsche Philosophie der Gegenwart in
Selbstdarstellungen_ (1921), vol. II.
Footnote 141:
E. Förster-Nietzsche, _Das Leben Nietzsches_, vol. II, p. 99.
Footnote 142:
W. M. Salter in his _Nietzsche the Thinker_—probably the best and most
exact study of Nietzsche’s thought we possess—summarises Nietzsche’s
“æsthetic metaphysics,” as he terms it (pp. 46-48), in words which
apply almost exactly to Gaultier.
Footnote 143:
See especially his book _Über den Nervösen Charakter_ (1912). It has
been translated into English.
Footnote 144:
Jules de Gaultier, _Le Bovarysme_, and various other of his works.
Georges Palante has lucidly and concisely expounded the idea of
Bovarism in a small volume, _La Philosophie du Bovarysme_ (_Mercure de
France_).
Footnote 145:
Gaultier has luminously discussed the relations of War, Civilisation,
and Art in the _Monde Nouveau_, August, 1920, and February, 1921.
Footnote 146:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account