After the first eighty years of its existence, the Frankish kingdom,
which under three generations of warlike monarchs had continued to
extend its borders so fast and so far, ceased suddenly to grow, and was
given up for a century and a half to ruinous civil wars, as objectless
as they were tedious and confused. In surrendering their primitive
Teutonic freedom to their royal house, in return for the glory and
aggrandisement which union under a single despotic hand gave to their
hitherto weak and scattered tribes, the Franks had bartered away their
future. As long as the house of Chlodovech were able and active, their
subjects could console themselves for submitting to an autocrat by
sharing in the power and plunder which a century of successful war
brought in to them. But when the Merovings, though still retaining their
despotic authority, grew weak and incapable, showing no trace of their
ancestor’s qualities, save an inveterate tendency to treachery and
fratricide, an evil time came upon the Frankish race. They paid for
their early aggrandisement by being condemned to five generations of
useless civil wars at home, and powerlessness abroad, while their
hereditary monarchs sacrificed everything to their unending family
feuds. Nothing more could be hoped for the Franks till they had rid
themselves of the nightmare-incubus of this wicked house, whose
repulsive annals are, on the whole, the most hopeless and depressing
page in the history of Europe.[22] From generation to generation their
story reeks with blood; there is nothing that can be compared to it for
horror in the records of any nation on this side of the Mediterranean.
We have to search the histories of the courts of Mohammedan Asia to
discover a parallel. The Franks only found salvation in the growth of
checks on the royal power by the development of the great provincial
governors, and by the final deposition of the Merovings in favour of the
great house of the descendants of St. Arnulf, the Mayors of the Palace,
whose strong hand at last stayed the fratricidal wars of the seventh
century. And even when the new dynasty had mounted the throne, the
Frankish realm showed fatal signs of the demoralisation it had suffered
under the old royal house. The tendency of the race to acquiesce in the
unwise habit of heritage-partition, and the unhappy grudge between the
eastern and the western Franks, were direct legacies of the Merovings.
Footnote 22:
In spite of the wickedness of the house of the Merovings, the Franks
were very loyal, even in the days of the decay of the royal race. We
find their chroniclers repeatedly contrasting the fidelity of the
Franks with the fickleness of their Visigothic neighbours, who, having
lost their ancient royal house, were continually making and unmaking
sovereigns from among the ranks of their counts and dukes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account