So great was the blow inflicted on the Caliph by the entire failure of
his army before Constantinople, that he was glad to conclude an
ignominious peace with the emperor, by which he engaged to pay 3000
pounds of gold to Constantine, and to send him fifty Arab horses for
every year that the treaty lasted (678).
The fidelity of the East-Romans to the house of Heraclius was thus
justified by the victory of Constantine; it is a pity that only a very
meagre account of his campaign has come down to us, owing to the dearth
of chroniclers in the seventh century. We know, however, that the fame
of his triumph went all over Europe, and that ambassadors came from the
Avars, the Lombards, and even the distant Franks to congratulate him on
beating off an attack which had threatened serious consequences to the
whole of Christendom.
[Sidenote: The Bulgarians.] For the remainder of his reign Constantine
enjoyed a well-earned peace, disturbed only by some slight bickering
with a new enemy, the Bulgarians. This Ugrian tribe, who had dwelt for
the last two centuries beyond the Danube, crossed the river in the end
of Constantine’s reign, and threw themselves upon the Slavonic tribes
who held Moesia. They subdued the Slavs without much difficulty, and
defeated a Roman army which Constantine led by sea to the mouth of the
Danube. Recognising that it was impossible to reconquer the long-lost
Moesia, the emperor made peace with Isperich, the Bulgarian king, and
allowed him to settle without further opposition in the land between the
Danube and the Balkans, where the Slavs had hitherto held possession
(679). A new Bulgarian nation was gradually formed by the intermixture
of the conquering tribe and their subjects: when formed, it displayed a
Slavonic rather than a Ugrian type, and spoke a Slavonic not a Ugrian
tongue.
The later years of Constantine V. were better known to contemporaries as
the time of the holding of the council of Constantinople, than as the
time of the foundation of the new Bulgarian kingdom. To settle the
dispute on the divine and human wills of Christ, the emperor summoned an
œcumenical synod, at which the Western churches were well represented.
It finally condemned the Monothelite heresy, which for the future ceased
to be the great question debated between the churches (680-1). But a new
controversy, that on Iconoclasm, was ere long to break out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account