Leo was a reformer and an innovator in every branch of administration.
His dealings with the Church are those which caused most stir and are
best remembered, but his activity was as great in secular as in
ecclesiastical matters. It is unfortunate that most of the records of
his reforms have perished, nothing having been preserved except his
_Ecloga_ or new handbook of law. But enough survives to show the
character of his administration, and its effects in the succeeding
century are very marked.
We have already pointed out in an earlier chapter that the East-Roman
Empire had been in a state of rapid decay since the middle of the sixth
century. The downward movement that had begun with the wars and taxes of
Justinian had been accelerated under his successors, and had threatened
the actual destruction of the empire during the reign of Heraclius. That
the State struggled through all its troubles, and emerged bleeding at
every pore, shorn of many of its members, but still alive, was due to
the personal abilities of Heraclius and his descendants
Constantinus-Constans and Constantine V. [Sidenote: Decadence of the
empire.] But though the life still lingered in the body of the State, it
was yet in the most deplorable condition. Its purely Oriental
provinces—Egypt, Syria, and Africa—were gone for ever. Asia Minor was
dreadfully wasted by the repeated invasions of the Saracens. The Balkan
peninsula was, as regards more than half its extent, in the hands of the
Bulgarians and Slavs. In the seventh century Slavonic tribes had made
their way even into Hellas and Peloponnesus, there to occupy all the
more remote and mountainous corners of the land.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account