The disappearance of predial serfdom was a change for the better within
the empire. But in most other things the changes had been for the worse.
The civilisation of the whole realm had sunk to a very low level
compared with that which prevailed in the fifth century. [Sidenote:
Decay of arts and letters.] Arts and letters had reached the lowest
depth which they ever knew in the East. All literature save the
compiling of polemical religious tracts had disappeared: between 620 and
720 we have not a single contemporary historian: the story of the times
has to be learned entirely from later sources. Poetical, scientific, and
philosophical composition had also died off; except the _Heracliad_—the
wars of Heraclius told as an epic—of George of Pisidia, the seventh
century produced no single poem. The study of Latin had so far died out
that the great legal works of Justinian had become useless to the
inhabitants of the empire. They were a sealed book to all save the
exceptionally learned, so that systematic law had almost disappeared. In
the various themes we find justice being administered according to local
customs and usages, instead of by old Roman precept. Leo had to abridge
and translate Justinian’s Code, in order to render it either useful or
intelligible. When doing this he omitted great sections of it, in order
to bring the book into accordance with the needs and customs of the day,
for both manners and social conditions had been transformed since the
reign of Justinian. The decay of art had been as rapid as that of
letters: very few remains of the unhappy seventh century have come down
to us, but in those which are most numerous, the coins of the emperors,
we find the most barbarous incapacity to express the simplest forms. The
faces of Heraclius or Constantine V. are barely human: the legends
surrounding them are so ill spelt as to be almost unintelligible: the
letters are ill formed and ill cut.
But the most painful feature of the time was that the decay of arts and
letters had been accompanied by the growth of a dense superstition and
ignorance which would have seemed incredible to the ancient Roman of the
fourth, or even the fifth century. Although Constantinople still
preserved all the great literary works of antiquity, the minds of its
rulers were no more influenced by them than were the eyes and hands of
its craftsmen inspired by the great works of Greek sculpture that still
adorned the streets. It was a time of the growth of countless silly
superstitions, of witchcraft and necromancy, of the framing of wild
legends of apocryphal saints, and of strange misconceptions of natural
phenomena.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account