This sanguinary lesson to the Iconodulic party seems to have cowed them
to such an extent that they did not raise another open rebellion in the
long reign of Constantine (740-775). But they adhered as fully as ever
to their faith: nothing is so difficult to eradicate as a well-rooted
superstition, and Constantine’s strong hand was better fitted to cow
than to persuade. As the years of his reign passed by, and he found
image-worship practised in secret by thousands of conscientious
votaries, the emperor grew more and more determined to uproot it. After
a time he resolved to call in the spiritual sanction to aid the secular
arm: in 753 he summoned a general council to meet at Constantinople, but
it was œcumenical only in name. The Pope replied by anathemas of
contumely to the summons to appear; the patriarchs of Antioch,
Jerusalem, and Alexandria, safe under the protection of the caliph,
denied their presence. [Sidenote: Council of Constantinople, 753.] But
there assembled an imposing body of three hundred and thirty-eight
bishops, presided over by the Constantinopolitan patriarch, Constantine
of Sylaeum, and by Theodosius, metropolitan of Ephesus, son of the
emperor Tiberius II. This council committed itself fully to Iconoclastic
doctrine; it proscribed all representations of Our Lord as blasphemous
snares, for endeavouring to express both His human and His divine nature
in the mere likeness of a man, and thereby obscuring His divinity in His
humanity. At the same time it condemned the worship of images of saints,
because all adoration except that paid to the Godhead savoured of
heathenism and anthropolatry. The emperor had other scruples of his own,
on which he did not press the council to deliver a decision; he denied
the intercessory powers of the Virgin, and scrupled to prefix the
epithet ἅγιος, ‘holy,’ to the names of even the greatest saints. He
spoke, for example, of ‘Peter the Apostle,’ not of ‘the holy Peter.’ On
these awful depths of free thought the Iconodules of his own and the
succeeding generation wasted expressions of horror, worthy to be
employed on a Herod or a Judas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account