Of all the neighbours of king Charles, it was Desiderius the Lombard who
was first destined to feel the weight of the Frankish sword. He had not
only received Carloman’s widow Gerberga, when she fled from Burgundy,
but had shown some intention of proclaiming her son king of the Franks.
Yet it was not this machination against Charles that was the actual
cause of war, but the relations of the Papacy with Desiderius. Hadrian
I. had just been raised to the Papal throne. He was a Roman by birth,
and a great hater of the Lombards. [Sidenote: Quarrel of the Pope and
the Lombards.] He refused the friendship and alliance which Desiderius
proffered, and very shortly after he was consecrated began to pick a
quarrel with the unfortunate king. He demanded from him the important
towns of Ferrara and Faenza, as part of the Exarchate of Ravenna. They
had been promised to St. Peter, he said, in 757, while Desiderius was
struggling for the crown with king Ratchis, and must be handed over at
once. Desiderius, thinking that Charles would be too much occupied
beyond the Alps in settling the newly-annexed dominions of his brother
to allow of his appearance in Italy, replied to the Pope’s challenge by
sending a host into the Pentapolis, and seizing Sinigaglia and Urbino.
Shortly afterwards he raised the full force of the Lombard realm, and
marched against Rome. Hadrian had expected this. He fortified and
strongly garrisoned the city, and sent in haste to bid the lord of the
Franks to come to the help of St. Peter, and force the unrighteous
Lombards to carry out in full the treaty that king Pippin had imposed
upon them. The news of the despatch of this embassy seems to have
frightened Desiderius. He drew back to Viterbo, and, instead of pressing
the siege of Rome, sent an embassy to Charles, to explain that the
Pope’s charges were unfounded, as he was not keeping back anything that
really belonged to the Exarchate (772, autumn).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account