unpopular regent, a boy-king sinking into his grave invited him to
active interference in Italy.
In Africa the condition of affairs was equally tempting. [Sidenote:
Hilderic’s Reign, 523-30.] We have already mentioned how, on the death
of king Thrasamund, the Vandal throne had fallen to his kinsman
Hilderic, the son of king Hunneric and the Roman princess, Eudocia.
Hilderic was elderly, unversed in affairs of state, and a conscientious
Catholic, inheriting from his Roman mother that orthodoxy which his
Arian subjects detested. He had but a short reign of seven years, but in
it he succeeded in alienating the affections of the Vandals in every
way. He incurred great odium for putting to death his predecessor’s
widow Amalafrida, the sister of the great Theodoric, because he found
her conspiring against him. His wars were uniformly unsuccessful, the
Moors of Atlas cut to pieces a whole army, and pushed their incursions
close to the gates of Carthage. Probably his open confession of
Catholicism, and promotion of Catholics to high office, were even
greater sources of wrath. In 530 his cousin Geilamir organised a
conspiracy against him, overthrew him with ease, and plunged him into a
dungeon. Justinian professed great indignation at this dethroning of an
orthodox and friendly sovereign, and resolved to make use of it as a
grievance against the new king of the Vandals. Just before the ‘Nika’
sedition broke out he had sent an embassy to Carthage to bid Geilamir
replace his cousin on the throne, and be contented with the place of
regent. The usurper answered rudely enough: ‘King Geilamir wishes to
point out to king Justinian that it is a good thing for rulers to mind
their own business.’[11] He trusted to the remoteness of his situation
and the domestic troubles of Justinian, and little thought that he was
drawing down the storm on his head.
Footnote 11:
There was deliberate insult in the use of the word βασιλεύς for both
monarchs, as if they were equal and bore the same title.
For Justinian had fully made up his mind to begin his attack on the West
by subduing the Vandals. All things were in his favour, notably the
facts that an Arian king was once more making life miserable to the
African Catholics, and that Vandal and Ostrogoth had been completely
estranged by the murder of Amalafrida nine years before. Amalaswintha
favoured rather than discouraged the emperor’s attack on her nearest
Teutonic neighbours. There was yet one more piece of good fortune: king
Geilamir had just sent off the flower of the Vandal troops to an
expedition against Sardinia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account