The dawn of astronomy: A study of the temple-worship and mythology of the ancient EgyptiansLockyer, Norman, Sir
Religion
The dawn of astronomy: A study of the temple-worship and mythology of the ancient Egyptians
Lockyer, Norman, Sir
Astronomy, Egyptian; Sun -- Mythology; Sun worship; Temples -- Egypt
Among the most important contributors to the astronomical side of
this subject are M. Biot and Professor Oppolzer. It is of the highest
importance to bring together the fundamental points which have been
made out by their calculations. We have determinate references to the
heliacal rising of Sirius, to the 1st of Thoth, to the solstice, and
to the rising of the Nile in connection with the Egyptian year; but,
so far as I have been able to make out, we find nowhere at present any
sharp reference to the importance of their correlation with the times
of the _tropical_ year at which these various phenomena took place. The
question has been complicated by the use by chronologists of the Julian
year in such calculations; so the Julian year and the use made of it by
chronologists have to be borne in mind. Unfortunately, many side-issues
have in this way been raised.
The heliacal rising of Sirius, of course--if in those days a true
_tropical_ year was being dealt with--would have given us a more or
less constant variation in the time of the rising over a long period,
_on account of its precessional movement_; and M. Biot and others
before him have pointed out that the variation, produced by that
movement, in the time of the year at which the heliacal rising took
place was almost exactly equal to the error of the _Julian_ year as
compared with the true tropical or Gregorian one. The Sirius year,
like the Julian, was about eleven minutes longer than the true year,
so that in 3,000 years we should have a difference of about 23 days.
Biot showed by his calculations, using the solar tables extant before
those of Leverrier, that from 3200 B.C. to 200 B.C. in the Julian year
of the chronologists, Sirius had constantly, in each year, risen
heliacally on July 20 Julian = June 20 Gregorian. Oppolzer, more
recently, using Leverrier's tables, has made a very slight correction
to this, which, however, is practically immaterial for the purposes of
a general statement. He shows that in the latitude of Memphis, in 1600
B.C., the heliacal rising took place on July 18·6, while in the year 0
it took place on July 19·7, both Julian dates.
The variation from the true tropical year brought about by the
processional movement of Sirius or any other star, however, can be
watched by noting its heliacal rising in relation to any physical
phenomenon which marks the true length of the tropical year. Such a
phenomenon we have in the solstice and in the rising of the Nile,
which, during the whole course of historical time, has been found to
rise and fall with constancy in each year, the initial rise of the
waters, some little way above Memphis, taking place very nearly at the
Summer Solstice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account