The dawn of astronomy: A study of the temple-worship and mythology of the ancient EgyptiansLockyer, Norman, Sir
Religion
The dawn of astronomy: A study of the temple-worship and mythology of the ancient Egyptians
Lockyer, Norman, Sir
Astronomy, Egyptian; Sun -- Mythology; Sun worship; Temples -- Egypt
"'That a star should act as time-warner it was necessary that it
should have so nearly the same amplitude as the sun that it could
be seen from the adytum through the eastern door, if it was to give
warning at its rising, or to have a similar but reversed amplitude
towards the west, if its heliacal setting was to be observed; and it
follows that in the choice of the festival day and the corresponding
orientation, on these principles, both the amplitude of the sun at its
rising and that of the star eastwards or westwards, as the case might
be, would have to be considered in connection with one another.
"'From what has been said it is obvious that in the intra-solstitial
temples the list of available bright stars and constellations is in
the first instance limited to those which lie within a few degrees
of the ecliptic, and it will be found that in the list above given
and those which follow, if we omit Eleusis, where the conditions
were exceptional, all but one of the stars are found in the zodiacal
constellations. A very great limit is imposed, in the second place,
by one of the conditions being the heliacal rising or setting of
those stars from which the selection has to be made. So that,
when both these combined limitations are taken into account, it
becomes improbable to the greatest degree that in every instance of
intra-solstitial temples of early foundation of which I have accurate
particulars, being twenty-eight in number and varying in their
orientation from 21° N. to 18° 25′ S. of the true east, there should
be found a bright heliacal star or constellation in the right position
at dates not in themselves improbable unless the temples had been so
oriented as to secure this combination.'
"I have just been looking into the number of possible stars which
could have been used, _i.e._ within the limits of the greatest
distance from the ecliptic that could have been utilised.
"The stars which could have been utilised in addition to the seven
which serve for nearly thirty temples are ten only, viz.:--
Aldebaran.
Pollux.
β Arietis.
β Tauri.
α and β Capricorni as a group.
β Libræ.
α Libræ.
α Leonis.
γ Leonis.
β Leonis.
"If the orientations had been placed at random, would not our thirty
temples have made many misses in aiming at these seventeen stars, it
being necessary also to hit exactly the heliacal margin? And would
they have secured anything like a due archæological sequence?
* * * * *
"Another point is this:--
"Whenever a star less than first magnitude is used (Pleiades only
excepted) it has been necessary, to secure coincidence, to give it
several more degrees of sun depression than in the cases of Spica and
Antares."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account