The dead towns of GeorgiaJones, Charles C., Jr. (Charles Colcock)
History
The dead towns of Georgia
Jones, Charles C., Jr. (Charles Colcock)
Extinct cities -- Georgia; Georgia -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
[179] When visited by an English traveller in 1743, this island was
inhabited by eight or ten families of _Indians_, who had considerable
tracts of open land, and were largely engaged in the cultivation of corn.
It abounded with game, “on which,” says the writer, “the good Indians
regaled us, and for Greens boiled us the Tops of China Briars, which eat
almost as well as Asparagus.” London Magazine for 1745, pp. 551, 552.
[180] McCall’s History of Georgia, vol. I, pp. 214, 215. Savannah, 1811.
[181] See Stevens’ History of Georgia, vol. I, pp. 453, 454.
[182] See Sanderson’s Biography of the Signers, vol. III, p. 120.
Philadelphia, 1823.
[183] McCall’s History of Georgia, vol. I, pp. 255, 256. Savannah, 1811.
[184] See Collections of the Georgia Historical Society, vol. III, p. 161,
et seq. Savannah, 1873.
[185] Travels Through North and South Carolina, Georgia, &c., p. 5.
London, 1792.
[186] His Observations were published in 1792.
[187] Idem, pp. 9, 10.
[188] See Watkins’ Digest, p. 144.
[189] See Stevens’ History of Georgia, vol. II, p. 92. Philadelphia, 1859.
[190] See Sanderson’s Biography of the Signers, vol. III, p. 55.
Philadelphia, 1823. McCall’s Georgia, vol. II, p. 41. Savannah, 1816.
[191] Sir Thomas Browne’s Hydriotaphia.
[192] See Letter of the 9th of February, 1775, signed by Lyman Hall,
Chairman. White’s Historical Collections of Georgia, pp. 520, 521. New
York, 1855. Sanderson’s Biography of the Signers, vol. III, p. 54.
Philadelphia, 1823.
[193] The apparent tardiness and hesitancy on the part of the Colony of
Georgia in casting her lot with her Sister Colonies at the inception of
those movements which culminated in a declaration of independence, may
be excused or accounted for when we remember that she was the youngest
and the least prepared of all the Colonies, and recall the fact that
Schovilites, leagued with Indians, were scourging her borders and
awakening in the breasts even of the most patriotic and daring, gravest
apprehensions for the safety of their wives and children. “The charge of
inactivity vanishes,” says Captain McCall, “when the sword and hatchet are
held over the heads of the actors to compel them to lie still.”
During the progress of the Revolution the term Schovilite which, at first,
was used to designate not only the bandit follower of Schovil, but also
every adherent of the Crown in the Southern provinces, was dropped, and
that of Loyalist and Tory substituted. The Revolutionists were known
as Whigs, Rebels, and Patriots. Many Loyalists who had fled from the
Carolinas and Georgia secured a retreat in East Florida whence, having
associated with themselves parties of Indians, under the name of Florida
Rangers, they indulged in predatory incursions into Georgia to the great
loss and disquietude of the southern portions of the Province.
History of Georgia, vol. II, p. 4. Savannah, 1816.
[194] See White’s Historical Collections of Georgia, pp. 517, 518. New
York, 1855.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account