The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actualitySpengler, Oswald
Philosophy
The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actuality
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
But it is difficult enough to form an exact idea even of the “Nature”
proper to another kind of man, although in this domain things
specifically cognizable are causally ordered and unified in a
communicable system. And it is quite impossible for us to penetrate
completely a historical world-aspect of “becoming” formed by a soul that
is quite differently constituted from our own. Here there must always be
an intractable residue, greater or smaller in proportion to our
historical instinct, physiognomic tact and knowledge of men. All the
same, the solution of this very problem is the condition-precedent of
all really deep understanding of the world. The historical environment
of another is a part of his _essence_, and no such other can be
understood without the knowledge of his time-sense, his destiny-idea and
the style and degree of acuity of his inner life. In so far therefore as
these things are not directly confessed, we have to extract them from
the symbolism of the alien Culture. And as it is thus and only thus that
we can approach the incomprehensible, the style of an alien Culture, and
the great time-symbols belonging thereto acquire an immeasurable
importance.
As an example of these hitherto almost uncomprehended signs we may take
the _clock_, a creation of highly developed Cultures that becomes more
and more mysterious as one examines it. Classical man managed to do
without the clock, and his abstention was more or less deliberate. To
the Augustan period, and far beyond it, the time of day was estimated by
the length of one’s shadow,[128] although sun-dials and water-clocks,
designed in conformity with a strict time-reckoning and imposed by a
deep sense of past and future, had been in regular use in both the older
Cultures of Egypt and Babylonia.[129] Classical man’s existence—
Euclidean, relationless, point-formed—was wholly contained in the
instant. Nothing must remind him of past or future. For the true
Classical, archæology did not exist, nor did its _spiritual inversion_,
_astrology_. The Oracle and the Sibyl, like the Etruscan-Roman
“haruspices” and “augurs,” did not foretell any distant future but
merely gave indications on particular questions of immediate bearing. No
time-reckoning entered intimately into everyday life (for the Olympiad
sequence was a mere literary expedient) and what really matters is not
the goodness or badness of a calendar but the questions: “who uses it?”
and “does the life of the nation run by it?” In Classical cities nothing
suggested duration, or old times or times to come—there was no pious
preservation of ruins, no work conceived for the benefit of future
generations; in them we do not find that durable[130] material was
deliberately chosen. The Dorian Greek ignored the Mycenæan stone-
technique and built in wood or clay, though Mycenæan and Egyptian work
was before him and the country produced first-class building-stone. The
Doric style is a timber style—even in Pausanias’s day some wooden
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account