The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actualitySpengler, Oswald
Philosophy
The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actuality
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
In every springtime, consequently, there are _two_ definitely ornamental
and non-imitative arts, that of building and that of decoration. In the
longing and pregnant centuries before it, elemental expression belongs
exclusively to Ornamentation in the narrow sense. The Carolingian period
is represented only by its ornament, as its architecture, for want of
the _Idea_, stands between the styles. And similarly, as a matter of
art-history, it is immaterial that no buildings of the Mycenæan age have
survived.[228] But with the dawn of the great Culture, _architecture as
ornament_ comes into being suddenly and with such a force of expression
that for a century mere decoration-as-such shrinks away from it in awe.
The spaces, surfaces and edges of stone speak _alone_. The tomb of
Chephren is the culmination of mathematical simplicity—everywhere right
angles, squares and rectangular pillars, nowhere adornment, inscription
or desinence—and it is only after some generations have passed that
Relief ventures to infringe the solemn magic of those spaces and the
strain begins to be eased. And the noble Romanesque of Westphalia-Saxony
(Hildesheim, Gernrode, Paulinzella, Paderborn), of Southern France and
of the Normans (Norwich and Peterborough) managed to render the whole
sense of the world with indescribable power and dignity in _one_ line,
_one_ capital, _one_ arch.
When the form-world of the springtime is at its highest, and not before,
the ordained relation is that architecture is lord and ornament is
vassal. And the word “ornament” is to be taken here in the widest
possible sense. Even conventionally, it covers the Classical _unit_-
motive with its quiet poised symmetry or meander supplement, the _spun
surface_ of arabesque and the not dissimilar surface-patterning of Mayan
art, and the “Thunder-pattern”[229] and others of the early Chóu period
which prove once again the landscape basis of the old Chinese
architecture without a doubt. But the warrior figures of Dipylon vases
are also conceived in the spirit of ornament, and so, in a far higher
degree still, are the statuary _groups_ of Gothic cathedrals. “The
figures were composed pillarwise from the spectator, the figures of the
pillar being, with reference to the spectator, ranked upon one another
like rhythmic figures in a symphony that soars heavenward and expands
its sounds in every direction.”[230] And besides draperies, gestures,
and figure-types, even the structure of the hymn-strophe and the
parallel motion of the parts in church music are ornament in the service
of the all-ruling architectural idea.[231] The spell of the great
Ornamentation remains unbroken till in the beginning of a “late” period
architecture falls into a _group_ of civic and worldly special arts that
unceasingly devote themselves to pleasing and clever imitation and
become _ipso facto_ personal. To Imitation and Ornament the same applies
that has been said already of time and space. Time gives birth to space,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account