The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actualitySpengler, Oswald
Philosophy
The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actuality
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
The Classical arithmetic, we are always told, was first liberated from
its sense-bondage, widened and extended by Diophantus, who did not
indeed create algebra (the science of undefined magnitudes) but brought
it to expression within the framework of the Classical mathematic that
we know—and so suddenly that we have to assume that there was a pre-
existent stock of ideas which he worked out. But this amounts, not to an
enrichment of, but a complete victory over, the Classical world-feeling,
and the mere fact should have sufficed in itself to show that, inwardly,
Diophantus does not belong to the Classical Culture at all. What is
active in him is a new number-feeling, or let us say a new limit-feeling
with respect to the actual and become, and no longer that Hellenic
feeling of sensuously-present limits which had produced the Euclidean
geometry, the nude statue and the coin. Details of the formation of this
new mathematic we do not know—Diophantus stands so completely by himself
in the history of so-called late-Classical mathematics that an Indian
influence has been presumed. But here also the influence it must really
have been that of those early-Arabian schools whose studies (apart from
the dogmatic) have hitherto been so imperfectly investigated. In
Diophantus, unconscious though he may be of his own essential antagonism
to the Classical foundations on which he attempted to build, there
emerges from under the surface of Euclidean _intention_ the new limit-
_feeling_ which I designate the “Magian.” He did not widen the idea of
number as magnitude, but (unwittingly) eliminated it. No Greek could
have stated anything about an _undefined_ number _a_ or an
_undenominated_ number 3—which are neither magnitudes nor lines—whereas
the new limit-feeling sensibly expressed by numbers of this sort at
least underlay, if it did not constitute, Diophantine treatment; and the
letter-notation which we employ to clothe our own (again transvalued)
algebra was first introduced by Vieta in 1591, an unmistakable, if
unintended, protest against the classicizing tendency of Renaissance
mathematics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account