The decline of the West, Volume 2 : $b Perspectives of world-historySpengler, Oswald
History
The decline of the West, Volume 2 : $b Perspectives of world-history
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
Diophantus[262] perhaps Jews or Chaldeans?
Now, the Christians also felt themselves from the outset as a nation
of the Magian cast, and, moreover, the others, Greeks (“heathen”)
and Jews alike, regarded them as such. Quite logically the latter
considered their secession from Judaism as high treason, and the
former their missionary infiltration into the Classical cities as an
invasion and conquest, while the Christians, on their side, designated
people of other faiths as τὰ ἔθνη.[263] When the Monophysites and
the Nestorians separated themselves from the Orthodox, new nations
came into being as well as new Churches. The Nestorians since 1450
have been governed by the Mar Shimun,[264] who was at once prince and
patriarch of his people and, _vis-à-vis_ the Sultan, occupied exactly
the same position as, long before, the Jewish Resh Galutha had occupied
in the Persian Empire.[265] This nation-consciousness, derived from
particular and defined world-feeling and therefore self-evident with
an _a priori_ sureness, cannot be ignored if we are to understand the
later persecutions of the Christians. The Magian State is inseparably
bound up with the concept of orthodoxy. Caliphate, nation, and Church
form an intimate unit. It was as _states_ that Adiabene went over to
Judaism, Osrhoene about 200 (so soon!) from Greekdom to Christendom,
Armenia in the sixth century from the Greek to the Monophysite Church.
Each of these events expresses the fact that the State was identical
with the orthodox community as a juridical person.[266] If Christians
lived in the Islamic State, Nestorians in the Persian, Jews in the
Byzantine, they did not and could not as unbelievers belong to it, and
consequently were thrown back upon their own jurisdictions.[267] If by
reason of their numbers or their missionary spirit they became a threat
to the continuance of the identity of state and creed-community,
persecution became a national duty. It was on this account that first
the “orthodox” (or “Greek”) and then the Nestorian Christians suffered
in the Persian Empire. Diocletian also, who as “Caliph”[268] (_Dominus
et Deus_) had linked the Imperium with the pagan cult-Churches and saw
himself in all sincerity as Commander of _these_ Faithful, could not
evade the duty of suppressing the second Church. Constantine changed
the “true” Church _and in that act changed the nationality_ of the
Byzantine Empire. From that point on, the Greek name slowly passed over
to the Christian nation, and specifically to that Christian nation
which the Emperor as Head of the Faithful recognized and allowed to
sit in the Great Councils. Hence the uncertain lines of the picture
of Byzantine history--in 290 the organization that of a Classical
Imperium, but the substance already a Magian national state; in 312
a change of nationality without change of name. Under this name of
“Greeks,” first Paganism as a nation fought the Christians, and then
Christianity as a nation fought Islam.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account