The decline of the West, Volume 2 : $b Perspectives of world-historySpengler, Oswald
History
The decline of the West, Volume 2 : $b Perspectives of world-history
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
With Paul, urban man and his “intelligence” come on the scene. The
others, though they might know Jerusalem or Antioch, never grasped the
essence of these cities. They lived soil-bound, rural, wholly soul and
feeling. But now there appeared a spirit that had grown up in the great
cities of Classical cast, that could only live in cities, that neither
understood nor respected the peasant’s countryside. An understanding
was possible with Philo, but with Peter never. Paul was the first by
whom the Resurrection-experience was _seen as a problem_; the ecstatic
awe of the young countryman changed in his brain into a conflict of
spiritual principles. For what a contrast!--the struggle of Gethsemane,
and the hour of Damascus: Child and Man, soul-anguish and intellectual
decision, self-devotion to death and resolve to change sides! Paul
had begun by seeing in the new Jewish sect a danger to the Pharisaism
of Jerusalem; now, suddenly, he comprehended that the Nazarenes “were
right”--a phrase that is inconceivable on the lips of Jesus--and took
up their cause against Judaism, thereby setting up as an _intellectual
quantity_ that which had previously consisted in the knowledge of an
experience. An intellectual quantity--but in making his cause into
this he unwittingly drove it close to the other intellectual powers,
_the cities of the West_. In the ambiance of pure Apocalyptic there
is no “intellect.” For the old comrades it was simply not possible to
understand him in the least--and mournfully and doubtfully they must
have looked at him while he was addressing them. Their living image
of Jesus (whom Paul had never seen) paled in this bright, hard light
of concepts and propositions. Thenceforward the holy memory faded
into a Scholastic system. But Paul had a perfectly exact feeling for
the true home of his ideas. His missionary journeys were all directed
westward, and the East he ignored. _He never left the domain of the
Classical city._ Why did he go to Rome, to Corinth, and not to Edessa
or Ctesiphon? And why was it that he worked _only in the cities, and
never from village to village?_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account