The decline of the West, Volume 2 : $b Perspectives of world-historySpengler, Oswald
History
The decline of the West, Volume 2 : $b Perspectives of world-history
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
It was a decisive factor--one of the results of Actium--that the
contest was fought out in the Greek tongue and in the territory of the
Pseudomorphosis--that is, under the full influence of the “Caliph”
of the Western Church. Constantine had even been the convener and
president of the Council of Nicæa, where the doctrine of Athanasius
carried the day. In the East, with its Aramaic speech and thought,
these doings were (as we know from the letters of Aphrahat) hardly
followed at all; there men saw no cause to quarrel about what, so far
as they were concerned, had long ago been settled. The breach between
East and West, a consequence of the Council of Ephesus (431) separated
two Christian _nations_, that of the “Persian Church” and that of
the Greek Church, but this was no more than the manifestation of a
difference, inherent from the first, between _modes of thought_ proper
to the two different landscapes. Nestorius and the whole East saw in
Christ the Second Adam, the Divine Envoy of the last æon. Mary had
borne a _man_-child in whose human and created substance (_physis_)
the godly, uncreated element _dwelt_. The West, on the contrary, saw
in Mary the Mother of a _God_: the divine and the human substance
formed in his body (_persona_, in the Classical idiom[453]) a unity,
named by Cyril ἕνωσις.[454] When the Council of Ephesus had recognized
the mother of God, her who gave birth to God, the city of Diana’s old
renown burst into a truly Classical orgy of celebration.[455]
But long ere this the Syrian Apollinaris[456] had heralded the
“Southern” idea of the matter--that in the living Christ there was not
merely a substance, but a single substance. The divine had transmuted
itself into, not mingled itself with, a human substance (no κρᾶσις,
as Gregory Nazianzen maintained in opposition; significantly enough,
the best way of expressing the Monophysite idea is through concepts of
Spinoza--the _one_ substance in another mode). The Monophysites called
the Christ of the Council of Chalcedon (451, where the West once more
prevailed) “the idol with the two faces.” They not only fell away
from the Church, they broke out in fierce risings in Palestine and
Egypt; and when in Justinian’s time the troops of Persia--that is, of
Mazdaism--penetrated to the Nile, they were hailed by the Monophysites
as liberators.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account