The Demon Trapper of Umbagog: A Thrilling Tale of the Maine ForestsThompson, Daniel P. (Daniel Pierce)
General
The Demon Trapper of Umbagog: A Thrilling Tale of the Maine Forests
Thompson, Daniel P. (Daniel Pierce)
Frontier and pioneer life -- Fiction; Maine -- Fiction; Trappers -- Fiction
After the attorney for the prosecution had read the papers on which it
was founded, and made a statement of what was expected to be proved in
its support, the witnesses in that behalf were called and sworn. The
first testimony introduced was that of Codman and others, to show the
deep malice and implied threats of revenge which the prisoner had so
clearly exhibited towards the supposed murdered man, in the prosecution
of which the latter was a principal mover, the winter before. But
this evidence, when sifted by the long and severe cross-examination
that followed, and found to consist, instead of definite words, almost
wholly of menacing looks and other silent demonstrations of rage, which
are ever extremely difficult to bring out in words with their original
effect, amounted to so little that the prisoner’s counsel attempted to
turn it into ridicule with considerable show of success. Testimony in
relation to the canoe of the Elwoods, recently found washed up among
the rapids, which was next introduced, was found, when tested in the
same way, in despite of the opinions of the practical boatmen who were
the witnesses, to be almost equally inconclusive of the prisoner’s
guilt; so much so, indeed, that his counsel seemed greatly inclined to
appropriate it, as showing the probable manner in which the Elwoods, if
they were not still both alive, had come to their end.
By this time,--as the court of inquiry was not opened till nearly
sunset, and as the examinations, cross-examinations, and preliminary
speeches of the opposing counsel, on disputed points of evidence, had
been drawn out to seemingly almost interminable lengths,--by this time,
it was nearly midnight; and the prosecuting party now proposed an
adjournment till morning. But this was strenuously opposed by Gaut’s
lawyer, who, affecting to believe that the whole affair was a malicious
prosecution growing out of the suit last winter, and got up by certain
men who had banded together to revenge their defeat on that occasion,
and ruin his client, boldly demanded that the prisoner should be
discharged, or his conspiring enemies be compelled to proceed at once
with “their sham prosecution,” as he put on the face to call it.
This stand, which was obviously instigated by the prisoner himself,
who narrowly watched the proceedings, and, from time to time, was seen
whispering in the ear of his counsel, produced the desired effect: the
motion was overruled, and the counsel for the prosecution told to go on
with his evidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account