The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Vol. II (1st Edition)Darwin, Charles
Science
The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Vol. II (1st Edition)
Darwin, Charles
Evolution (Biology); Human beings -- Origin; Sex differences; Sexual dimorphism (Animals); Sexual selection in animals
[179] ‘Origin of Species,’ fifth edit. 1869, p. 104. I had
always perceived, that rare and strongly-marked deviations of
structure, deserving to be called monstrosities, could seldom
be preserved through natural selection, and that the
preservation of even highly-beneficial variations would depend
to a certain extent on chance. I had also fully appreciated the
importance of mere individual differences, and this led me to
insist so strongly on the importance of that unconscious form
of selection by man, which follows from the preservation of the
most valued individuals of each breed, without any intention on
his part to modify the characters of the breed. But until I
read an able article in the ‘North British Review’ (March,
1867, p. 289, _et seq._), which has been of more use to me than
any other Review, I did not see how great the chances were
against the preservation of variations, whether slight or
strongly pronounced, occurring only in single individuals.
[180] ‘Introduct. to the Trochilidæ,’ p. 102.
[181] Gould, ‘Handbook of Birds of Australia,’ vol. ii. p. 32
and 68.
[182] Audubon, ‘Ornitholog. Biography,’ 1838, vol. iv. p. 389.
[183] Jerdon, ‘Birds of India,’ vol. i. p. 108; and Mr. Blyth,
in ‘Land and Water,’ 1868, p. 381.
[184] Graba, ‘Tagebuch, Reise nach Färo,’ 1830, s. 51-54.
Macgillivray, ‘Hist. British Birds,’ vol. iii. p. 745. ‘Ibis,’
vol. v. 1863, p. 469.
[185] Graba, ibid. s. 54. Macgillivray, ibid. vol. v. p. 327.
[186] ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication.’
vol. ii. p. 92.
[187] On these points see also ‘Variation of Animals and Plants
under Domestication,’ vol. i. p. 253; vol. ii. p. 73, 75.
[188] See, for instance, on the irides of a Podica and
Gallicrex in ‘Ibis,’ vol. ii. 1860, p. 206; and vol. v. 1863,
p. 426.
[189] See also Jerdon, ‘Birds of India,’ vol. i. p. 243-245.
[190] ‘Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle,’ 1841, p. 6.
[191] Bechstein, ‘Naturgeschichte Deutschlands,’ B. iv. 1795,
s. 31, on a sub-variety of the Monck pigeon.
[192] This woodcut has been engraved from a beautiful drawing,
most kindly made for me by Mr. Trimen; see also his description
of the wonderful amount of variation in the coloration and
shape of the wings of this butterfly, in his, ‘Rhopalocera
Africæ Australis,’ p. 186. See also an interesting paper by the
Rev. H. H. Higgins, on the origin of the ocelli in the
Lepidoptera in the ‘Quarterly Journal of Science,’ July, 1868,
p. 325.
[193] Jerdon, ‘Birds of India,’ vol. iii. p. 517.
[194] ‘Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,’
vol. i. p. 254.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account