The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
[2] Cp. _infra_ p. 12, _ad fin._
[3] Cp. Arist. Pol. i. 13, § 10.
[4] Cp. Theaet. 146 D.
[5] Cp. Aristot. Post. Anal. I. i. 6.
[6] Pindar, Frag. 98 (Boeckh).
[7] Or, whether a certain area is capable of being inscribed as a
triangle in a certain circle.
[8] Or, when you apply it to the given line, i. e. the diameter of the
circle (αὐτοῦ).
[9] Or, similar to the area so applied.
[10] Theog. 33 ff.
[11] Theog. 435 ff.
[12] Cp. Euthyphro 11 B.
EUTHYPHRO.
INTRODUCTION.
[Sidenote: _Euthyphro._]
[Sidenote: INTRODUCTION.]
In the Meno, Anytus had parted from Socrates with the significant
words: ‘That in any city, and particularly in the city of Athens, it is
easier to do men harm than to do them good’ (94 E); and Socrates was
anticipating another opportunity of talking with him (99 E). In the
Euthyphro, Socrates is awaiting his trial for impiety. But before the
trial begins, Plato would like to put the world on their trial, and
convince them of ignorance in that very matter touching which Socrates is
accused. An incident which may perhaps really have occurred in the family
of Euthyphro, a learned Athenian diviner and soothsayer, furnishes the
occasion of the discussion.
* * * * *
[Sidenote: ANALYSIS.]
This Euthyphro and Socrates are represented as meeting in the
porch of the King Archon. (Cp. Theaet. sub fin.) Both have =Steph.= 2
legal business in hand. Socrates is defendant in a suit for impiety
which Meletus has brought against him (it is remarked by the 3
way that he is not a likely man himself to have brought a suit
against another); and Euthyphro too is plaintiff in an action for
murder, which he has brought against his own father. The latter 4
has originated in the following manner:—A poor dependant of
the family had slain one of their domestic slaves in Naxos. The
guilty person was bound and thrown into a ditch by the command
of Euthyphro’s father, who sent to the interpreters of religion
at Athens to ask what should be done with him. Before the
messenger came back the criminal had died from hunger and
exposure.
[Sidenote: _Analysis 5-9._]
This is the origin of the charge of murder which Euthyphro
brings against his father. Socrates is confident that before he
could have undertaken the responsibility of such a prosecution,
he must have been perfectly informed of the nature of piety and 5
impiety; and as he is going to be tried for impiety himself, he
thinks that he cannot do better than learn of Euthyphro (who will
be admitted by everybody, including the judges, to be an unimpeachable
authority) what piety is, and what is impiety. What
then is piety?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account